Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAQ: U.S., Britain Seek to Limit UN Iraq Role (a role in humanitarian relief but not peacekeeping)
Yahoo News - AP ^ | Fri, May 02, 2003 | MATT KELLEY, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 05/02/2003 8:31:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

LONDON - The United States and Britain are preparing a resolution that would give the United Nations (news - web sites) a role in humanitarian relief but not peacekeeping in Iraq (news - web sites), a senior Bush administration official said Friday.

Photo
AP Photo


Slideshow


(AP Video)

Special Coverage
Latest news:
· Orlando Honors Ex-POW Captured in Iraq
AP - 5 minutes ago
· US, Britain, Poland forming Iraq stabilization force
AFP - 17 minutes ago
· Tape Shows Exhausted, Confused Saddam
AP - 33 minutes ago
Special Coverage

 

Separately, the United States has decided to divide the military and humanitarian relief mission in Iraq into three parts under American, British and Polish command, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Six European countries have agreed to contribute troops to the British and Polish sectors to create an international stability force, the official said.

The draft resolution would limit the U.N. role to helping with refugees and displaced people, reconstruction and humanitarian assistance, the official said. The United States and Britain agree on all but a few of the fine details of the resolution, the official said, though there is no timetable on when it would be introduced.

U.N. officials are already in Iraq providing humanitarian relief. U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) said this week that the body has no interest in policing a postwar Iraq, although it could contribute to the political resuscitation of the country.

"Take the question of security. I don't think the U.N. would want to take on that," Annan said. "There has been a suggestion that the U.N. wanted to take over the whole Iraq and run it, which was also not the case." What the United Nations could contribute beyond humanitarian assistance was "political facilitation," Annan said.

The proposed draft resolution would probably face resistance from other U.N. Security Council members who have favored a U.N.-convened conference of the kind that helped establish Afghanistan (news - web sites)'s post-Taliban government.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld discussed the resolution with British Prime Minister Tony Blair (news - web sites) and Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon on Friday as Rumsfeld returned from a tour of Iraq, Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf region. Rumsfeld said afterward he hoped the U.N. would play a role but did not publicly discuss the draft resolution outlining that role.

Hoon, who joined Rumsfeld in a news conference at Heathrow airport, also did not mention the draft resolution.

"We are right to be optimistic about the way forward" in Iraq, Hoon said.

International stability forces will be sent to Iraq as soon as possible, the U.S. official said, though it was unclear when that would be. Those troops will work to restore and maintain order and supervise humanitarian projects such as the restoration of water and electricity and delivery of food and medical aid.

The six nations contributing troops are Italy, Spain, Ukraine, Denmark, the Netherlands and Bulgaria, the official said. Representatives of those countries will meet with British officials May 7 and Polish officials May 22 to determine what forces each country will contribute and whether they will be put under British or Polish command.

The U.S. part of the stability force will be comprised of American troops. While that portion is likely to consist of a military division — about 20,000 — the troop strength of the other two sectors has yet to be determined, the official said.

The international stabilization force would be under the U.S. war commander, Gen. Tommy Franks.

At least initially, the coalition stability forces will augment rather than replace the 135,000 American troops inside Iraq, the official said. The stability forces will focus on providing security and humanitarian relief while other U.S. troops focus on rooting out leftover members of Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s government and other armed elements in Iraq.

Rumsfeld said, however, that the more troops other countries contribute to the stability effort, the fewer U.S. troops will be needed inside Iraq.

Planning for both the U.N. resolution and the international security force left out France, Germany and Russia, three U.S. allies that vehemently opposed the war in Iraq.

Some of the NATO (news - web sites) members who agreed to send troops may want NATO authorization for that action, the official said. Requests for such authorization will be routed through the alliance's defense planning committee, which does not include France, the official said.

The outlines for the international stability force were decided at a conference Hoon hosted Wednesday with representatives from 16 countries, mostly NATO members. Other countries including the Philippines, South Korea (news - web sites), Qatar and Australia agreed to send other help such as field hospitals, engineers, explosive ordnance disposal teams or nuclear, biological and chemical weapons experts.

The U.S., British and Polish sectors will be drawn to take into account ethnic, religious, tribal and political factions within Iraq, the official said. For example, although ethnic Kurds are the majority in large parts of northern Iraq, there are also large numbers of Kurds within Baghdad.

Some Arab countries also want to play a role in the stability operation in Iraq but are reluctant to send troops because of political, religious and ethnic considerations, the official said. Countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council have offered to donate money for the effort.

Rumsfeld also met Friday with King Abdullah of Jordan, an American ally in the Middle East. Defense officials say Jordan provided key help in the Iraq war, acting as a staging area for U.S. special operations raids into western Iraq to prevent missiles from being fired at Jordan or Israel.

Rumsfeld did not say what the two discussed.




TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq

1 posted on 05/02/2003 8:31:25 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Take the question of security. I don't think the U.N. would want to take on that," Annan said. "There has been a suggestion that the U.N. wanted to take over the whole Iraq and run it, which was also not the case." What the United Nations could contribute beyond humanitarian assistance was "political facilitation," Annan said.

BS. Annan tries to grab power whenever he can. He's admitting defeat.

2 posted on 05/02/2003 8:49:44 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Limit?
Limit UN?
What UN?
They're history. Obsolete. Gone.
If we don't pull out of there and stop this "yank-our-chain" nonsense we might as well start buying "French" fries again, instead of "FREEDOM" fries.
3 posted on 05/02/2003 9:29:00 PM PDT by MeekMom ((HUGE Ann Coulter Fan!!!) (Life-long Python Addict))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekMom
Let's make sure the UN is history. Obsolete. Gone. Visit http://www.cunr.org and check the voting record of your congressional representative.

Contact that representative and act accordingly to his/her ranking of Global Statesman.

The UN rot is insidious, deep and very difficult to remove. Might as well start with congress.
4 posted on 05/03/2003 6:58:01 AM PDT by ohmage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
hear, hear, the UN is worthless.....
5 posted on 05/03/2003 6:59:34 AM PDT by The Wizard (Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) said this week that the body has no interest in policing a postwar Iraq, although it could contribute to the political resuscitation of the country.

Under NO circumstances, should the UN have anything to do with politics in Iraq.

6 posted on 05/03/2003 8:50:28 AM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson