Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mware
That is why they added that bit, that says if one part of the bill is unconstitutional they do not throw out the whole law.

I think there's some question whether that part itself is constitutional.

19 posted on 05/02/2003 12:50:03 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
That is why they added that bit, that says if one part of the bill is unconstitutional they do not throw out the whole law.

And from what I've read, the "part" that would be left if this is upheld, totally favors the GOP.

24 posted on 05/02/2003 12:55:27 PM PDT by Howlin (The most hated lair on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson