To: mrsmith; Petronski; Wphile
Yes, I saw that passage. That's part of what makes me think this story is being misreported.
To: aristeides
I haven't read the opinions but perhaps she is just trying to say that the whole premise for the bill is wrong. That the purpose of political speech is to support a candidate and that denying the mention of a candidate's name in an RNC ad say is unconstitutional. So, for the pernicious part perhaps she was talking about the provision that only allows soft money for GOTV and party building but not political ads.
155 posted on
05/02/2003 1:46:16 PM PDT by
Wphile
(Keep the UN out of Iraq)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson