[metacognative]

People who cannot see the difference between predictable physico-chemical tendencies toward equilibrium and the claims of darwinites [molecules to Man] exasperate me and I see no sense in continuing to point out the obvious: snowflakes are not living cells and comparisons are ridiculous.

[whattajoke]

People who cannot see the difference between predictable physico-chemical tendencies toward equilibrium and the claims of darwinites [molecules to Man] exasperate me and I see no sense in continuing to point out the obvious: snowflakes are not living cells and comparisons are ridiculous.

So you promise never to invoke the "tornado in a junkyard" garbage like so many creationist do? Thank you.

So you are saying that non living things (snowflakes) are capable of un-intellingent "design," but living, replicating cells are not? That sounds kinda backwards.

[Right Wing Professor]

People who cannot see the difference between predictable physico-chemical tendencies toward equilibrium and the claims of darwinites [molecules to Man] exasperate me

No doubt. But what has your emotional state got to do with the discussion?

I see no sense in continuing to point out the obvious: snowflakes are not living cells and comparisons are ridiculous.

Snowflakes obey the same physical laws as living cells, and you can't bluster your way out of that.