[carl in alaska]

"This proves nothing except that you are unable to comprehend the fact that because the theory deals with existing life forms, it has nothign to do with how those life forms came into being.

This class went beyond the emergence of the very first primitive single-celled life form and also covered the "evolutionary process" that could change this first life form into more complex early single-celled organisms. What I'd like to know is where you got the idea that I am "unable to comprehend" the theory of evolution. That is a rather harsh rebuke given to someone about whom you know essentially nothing. If there's something bothering you in your life that's making you angry, send me a private Freeper mail and maybe we can talk about it offline. God Bless you my friend.

Carl in Alaska (currently in California for a few more weeks)

[Dimensio]

What I'd like to know is where you got the idea that I am "unable to comprehend" the theory of evolution. That is a rather harsh rebuke given to someone about whom you know essentially nothing.

If you honestly believe that the theory of evolution makes importance of the means by which the first life forms came into existence, then you are ignorant of the theory. I noticed that you didn't address my possible scenarios for how life might have come into existence on earth, which doesn't surprise me since no creationist bothers to address it. Apparently they realise that their claim that life origins are important to the theory of evolution is false, so they deliberately ignore anything that trashes the lie.