[plusone]

I don't believe either side, I think both are in error. Evolution claims to be scientific, yet cannot account for how NS can create partially developed, non-functioning appendages which confer no advantage to the holder. How can a 1% eye survive as an advantage to be passed on to the offspring? My second point is that the ID group would use such an argument to defend their belief in God, when it does no such thing.

[Aric2000]

You haven't studied evolution much have you?

Otherwise you would not ask questions that have been answered on these threads forever.

If you are really that interested follow the links that PatrickHenry so nicely provided at the beginning of this thread. You might learn something.

Because I sure as heck am not going to go into something that has been discussed and answered a thousand times.

If you are REALLY interested, then you will follow my instructions above.