[bondserv]

This is meaningless. I could bring up several hundred literary works that do not contradict various known scientific theories. This does not mean that the literary works in question 'support' the scientific theories.

We are talking Newton here. Not some flash in the pan wacko at a Liberal University that will be disproven tomorrow.

[Dimensio]

We are talking Newton here. Not some flash in the pan wacko at a Liberal University that will be disproven tomorrow.

I am aware of whom you speak. I've yet to see any support for your assertion that the Bible is the foundation for many current scientific theories. Lack of contradiction is not the same thing as 'support'. I see little in the Bible that directly contradicts the theory of relativity, but I don't think it wise to claim that the Bible provides support for it.

[bondserv]

Ping