[whattajoke]

Apparrently it is not entirely convincing to PBS either, which, in spite of its overwhelming evolutionary bias, has produced the non-religious program you evos must classify as religious in order to discredit it.

Was it you who carped that someone hadn't read the original article? Because from your post, it appears to me you didn't get past the first sentence... This is not a "PBS produced video" as you claim.

Isn't it also you, Dataman, lord of spelling and grammar, who likes to always add "(sic)" everytime someone you don't agree with has a typo or misspelling? Well, "Apparrently" (sic), even you are not immune.

Also, to claim ID isn't religious is quite simply breaking a Commandment: "thou shall not bear false witness." It's an outright boldfaced lie... but you can pray for forgiveness at church tomorrow, it'll be ok.

[Dataman]

This is not a "PBS produced video" as you claim.

I stand corrected by whattajoke! (humiliating experience).

Isn't it also you, Dataman, lord of spelling and grammar, who likes to always add "(sic)" everytime someone you don't agree with has a typo or misspelling?

You found my other weakness. Corrected again! My problem isn't with people who can't spell. I just like to jab those who pretend to by hyper cephalic cold objective scientists and then procede tu mispel a grate numbr of simpl werds.