Replies

My point is that humans have the ability to apply intelligence to a problem and with years of intensive research and experimentation continue to fail with cancer

Yes, because humans haven't yet figured out a means of developing a technology that can effectively and safely destroy cancer 100% of the time. That doesn't prove anything with respect to intelligent design.

For some reason evolutionists believe that mother nature can resolve these anomalies with time.

What, cancer? I've never heard anyone make such a silly claim. I think that you're introducing irrelevant information into your argument.

Time and mother nature have no intelligence!

The modifier 'mother' implies something that isn't there, so I prefer to call it 'nature', but you are right in that time and nature have no intelligence (nature itself has no inherent overall intelligence even if certain components within are intelligent). Again, your point?

Show me where mother nature, outside of life, has created a structure that provides a specific function that combats the chaos of the universe.

This question really doesn't have any meaning. Planets managed to 'organize' themselves into rather stable orbits around stars, if that works, but I really don't know what it is that you're asking.

The Biblical explanation of origins and the creation of the universe makes perfect sense.

Perfect sense with respect to what? Why specifically the Biblical account? Why not the account of some other religion?

Our earth has a multitude of destructive systems that only when taken in their totality could create the perfect balance for a sustainable environment that supports life.

Please be specific.

There is no evidence that even approaches explaining how nature could carefully orchestrate destructive systems that can together create the balance that is needed to sustain life.

You're making the faulty assumption that nature 'created' this planet specifically to sustain life. More likely, life arose on this planet because it was able to come about and thrive on this planet.

Try looking into the degrees and percentages of the systems that are required to maintain a life supporting environment.

I have. I've also heard bizarre false assertions regarding these variables such as claims that the if the earth were just a little closer to the sun that we would all "burn" and that if it were just a little farther that we would all "freeze". Once again, you're claiming that you don't see how it is possible for it to have happened without divine intervention and assuming divine intervention.

There is no evidence that even approaches explaining how nature could carefully orchestrate destructive systems that can together create the balance that is needed to sustain life.

And your point is what, that some divine entity has prevented coments from slamming into Earth?

Evolution stands upon very shaky ground when you consider the present observable evidence.

Only if you're afraid of research and you cling to bogus probability studies.

The Bible's got this one right folks.

Once again, even if you utterly disproved evolution, how would this prove the Bible correct?