Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Severe immune response kills SARS victims
NewScientist.com news service ^ | May 3, 2003 | Robert Walgate

Posted on 05/02/2003 8:39:46 AM PDT by CathyRyan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Smokin' Joe
...state of the art, top secret ,stealth aircraft flying out of the desert in Nevada ...

Thank you.

You have just proven demonstrated my point ...

61 posted on 05/03/2003 9:57:46 AM PDT by _Jim (Guangdong doctor linked as source of SARS in China: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
That all this would be necessary if the equipment were purchased from elewhwere is true. However, while a significant portion of the Chinese population is engaged in blue-collar tasks, from planting rice to factory work, the Chinese have developed their best talents in the field of science and engineering since the days when China was closed to the West. The best of the best get a thorough technical/scientific education, and have been kept up to date via western journals since well back in the cold war days.

It is by no means inconcievable that the Chinese have obtained the designs for western equipment and built knock-offs or even designed their own and manufactured it. Especially when you factor in the pervasive security breaches evident in the trade practices of the Clinton Administration. If Los Alamos was penetrated, then what other facilities may have also been compromised?

Never, never underestimate the capabilities of a potential enemy.

62 posted on 05/03/2003 10:04:42 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: CathyRyan
It maybe the biggest story in the world but is looks like it is starting to run out of steam on FR.

You need to understand, there are people on this site and elsewhere that believe that those that are discussing this, or posting articles on this, are somehow not good Republican's due to the fact that it's hurting the economy and tourism is particular. There are a few that have even made jokes and posted cute graphics to attempt to minimize this nasty disease, and portray those that discuss this as scare mongers and people who are somehow hysterical etc.

Some reports actually have the number of deaths at over 500 with many thousands infected or possibly infected.

*Never* trust anyone who would make a joke about something like this as a means to isolate or minimize economic losses or to shield their particular political party..

63 posted on 05/03/2003 10:07:01 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Two months ago, the British "Jane's" Defense-Aerospace, had an article about China's Space program where they said that China has 30,000 scientists and engineers working on her space program in a special city.

So, it would seem that China would lkely be able to organize enough resources in the bio-medical field to do research and come up with a vaccine on the fast -track
64 posted on 05/03/2003 10:08:01 AM PDT by The Pheonix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
That all this would be necessary if the equipment were purchased from elewhwere is true.

China is a leading producer of electron microscopes?

China is a leading producer of automated hi-tech lab equipment?

Furthermore, is it your contention that these facilities *do* indeed exist in the back-woods of China for the purposes of broducing so-called bio-engineered viruses BUT these facilites and supporting infrastructure are invisible to both the naked eye and spy satellites?

Frankly, I don't get your point. I don't think you got mine either, as evidenced by a couple of posts now ...

65 posted on 05/03/2003 10:13:36 AM PDT by _Jim (Guangdong doctor linked as source of SARS in China: http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: All
TheNewOrleansChannel.com
N.O. Researchers Make SARS Breakthrough Protein Could Be Key To Cure
POSTED: 4:00 p.m. CDT May 1, 2003
UPDATED: 9:44 a.m. CDT May 2, 2003

NEW ORLEANS -- A medical breakthrough in the study of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, is taking place in New Orleans.

Researchers at the Louisiana State University and Tulane health science centers have developed a model of the protein suspected to be responsible for the spread of the disease.

The information is being rushed to other scientists who are working on a SARS cure. It may show that certain drugs might be able to help.

It's the type of discovery that doctors normally wait to present at a medical conference or publish in a medical journal. But both health science centers published their finding on the Internet, hoping it could bring researchers closer to a treatment or cure.

LSU's Dr. William Gallaher and Tulane's Dr. Robert Garry are sharing credit.

The model shows that the surface protein attached to the SARS virus is similar to what's been discovered in the Ebola virus and HIV, it gives hope of a cure, researchers said.

"The similarity between this protein in HIV and a couple of very discreet regions is so high that actually, there are drugs in the pipeline that may directly work," Gallaher said.

"We already know that some drugs that work against those similar proteins in HIV and Ebola will block those viruses from infecting the cells," Garry said. "We're hoping to do the same thing with the new corona virus."

SARS can be fatal and is highly contagious through face-to-face contact and shared common surfaces.

The illness usually begins with fever, chills, headaches and body aches. After about seven days, the patient may develop a dry cough. At that point, doctors say too little oxygen will be getting into the blood, causing about 10 to 20 percent of patients to require a ventilator to breathe.

66 posted on 05/03/2003 11:04:42 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: per loin; Dog Gone; Petronski; riri; EternalHope; Domestic Church; aristeides; CathyRyan; ...
ping to 66
67 posted on 05/03/2003 11:16:43 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; per loin; CathyRyan; Judith Anne; EternalHope; blam; Dog Gone
Diagram of the spread of SARS from the Hotel Metropole in Hong Kong
68 posted on 05/03/2003 2:48:04 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: riri
Fascinating chart, thank you very much for the post.
69 posted on 05/03/2003 3:00:58 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: riri
Thanks for the chart!
70 posted on 05/03/2003 3:33:49 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: riri

HCW = Health Care Worker

71 posted on 05/03/2003 4:57:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: The Pheonix
Two months ago, the British "Jane's" Defense-Aerospace, had an article about China's Space program where they said that China has 30,000 scientists and engineers working on her space program in a special city.

So, it would seem that China would lkely be able to organize enough resources in the bio-medical field to do research and come up with a vaccine on the fast -track

With all due respect, I think that aerospace projects and bio-technology fields are as different as apples and oranges. And to address a previous poster's point, nuclear technology is a different area altogether.

Perhaps the possible inclination to equate these forms of technology comes from the fact that the US has developed all of them simultaneously.

The "Third World" has not, which means that a country can be a Wiz at building nuclear bombs or computers, but have obsolete medical care facilities.

72 posted on 05/03/2003 5:20:09 PM PDT by Concentrate (Vote Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Frankly, I don't get your point. I don't think you got mine either, as evidenced by a couple of posts now ...

I would appreciate it if you would state your point or points. Be clear and direct. Help us out. Give us a good reason why SARS is not something to be concerned about.

73 posted on 05/03/2003 5:30:00 PM PDT by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
HAVE you at all paid attention to some of the Avian Flu virues that has 'shown up' in Europe? WHY don't you have the same sort of 'tin foil take' as to their origins?

But I don't have any tin-foil take on how SARS has originated. SARS is probably some newly originating virus derived naturally, although I could be wrong. The avian flu virus has not created the havoc that the SARS virus has especially in China.

Personally, I haven't had any kind of flu in years, and I don't know why. (Cross my fingers!) I don't get the flu vaccine, and neither does my family. I get "colds" and "bad colds", but nothing like I've heard about from others who do. How about you?

We do wash our hands fairly frequently, though.

74 posted on 05/03/2003 5:44:32 PM PDT by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
You need to understand, there are people on this site and elsewhere that believe that those that are discussing this, or posting articles on this, are somehow not good Republican's due to the fact that it's hurting the economy and tourism is particular. There are a few that have even made jokes and posted cute graphics to attempt to minimize this nasty disease, and portray those that discuss this as scare mongers and people who are somehow hysterical etc.

That's more or less the same attitude the Chicoms had until recently, and it's likely to be as suicidal -- even politically -- as that attitude has been for the Chicoms. You'd think people would learn from the example of China.

75 posted on 05/03/2003 7:43:09 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
China isn't known as a leading producer of nuclear weapons or delivery systems. Yet they have both. As for electron Microscopes, sure, they have them. As for facilities, these will exist where they are established. We assume the same standards of equipment and facilities which we would have are even necessary to produce a bioweapon. Think basic, cheap, and put in the boonies in case there is an accident, just like the Americans do.

My point about "Groom Lake Airstrip (abandoned)" (AKA Area 51) as referred to on a map from the early '70s, is that these facilities can exist in out of the way places. This is why the Air Force investigated UFO sightings, to decry the persons who had seen research aircraft. Weather baloons and the mentally imbalanced, right?

The Communists thwarted detection and remote sensing measures very well during the Vietnam war, with the help of Chinese and Soviet advisors, and it would be folly to assume that all construction of facilities requires the grand scale we would use, which would be readily viewable on satellite imaging.

Could a facility for bioweapons research be built without our knowledge? After Clinton's people attempting to cripple our intelligence network, certainly. Even so, spy/intelligence satellites orbit, and orbital windows of opportunity exist for getting things done unobserved, if the perpetrators have patience and sufficient labor, which the Communists have. As for equipment and knowledge, it is obvious that they have it, or they would not have been able to isolate the genome. Creation requires only one lab, a building on a university or technical school campus, not an entire complex. As for brooding the viruses, this can be done in a micro brewery-sized operation which could be hauled in three semi-trucks and hooked together almost anywhere.

You seem to be under the impression that the Chinese are without advanced technological capabilities, simply because they are not the world's leading producers of high tech equipment. Watch them--where are Dell Computers being made now?

Would you, were you the Chinese, admit to having a bioweapons program accident? Would you admit to having a bioweapons program? Not likely. Think like an old line, cold war Communist; things really haven't changed all that much.

While it is possible that this is just another Swine Flu, at least in terms of genesis, I would never assume that the Chinese are incapable of anything. After all, the Chinese Government slew millions of Chinese just to sieze power, and continues to arrest, imprison, and execute its own people just for speaking their mind.

76 posted on 05/03/2003 8:07:08 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
I'd like to make my hypotheses. Those without D32 at gene CCR5 will dia at a high rate. Those with one copy will live. Those with 2 copies cannot become infected.
77 posted on 05/03/2003 8:15:27 PM PDT by IYAAYAS (Live free or die trying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson