Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last Flight of X-31 Ends with 24-Degree ESTOL
Navy Newsstand ^ | 5/2/2003 2:17:00 AM | James Darcy

Posted on 05/02/2003 8:29:33 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

PATUXENT RIVER, Md. (NNS) -- Flight testing of the Vectoring, Extremely Short Takeoff and Landing, Control and Tailless Operation Research (VECTOR) X-31 ended April 29, following a week of successful demonstrations of the world's first fully automated, thrust vectored landings at up to 24 degrees angle of attack.

For three years, the VECTOR test team has been working to demonstrate the viability of thrust vectoring for extremely short takeoff and landing (ESTOL), using the unique X-31 as a test bed for the concept.

Marine Corps Maj. Cody Allee made the last flight of the thrust-vectored jet April 29, completing an automated ESTOL landing at 24 degrees angle of attack and 121 knots, a 31 percent reduction from the aircraft's normal landing speed of 175 knots.

The X-31 typically requires 8,000 feet to stop after a conventional landing, Allee said. Following his ESTOL touchdown, he needed just 1,700 feet to slow the X-31 down enough to turn around in the middle of the runway and taxi in a complete circle.

In contrast to a normal landing where the scenery is flying by as a blur in his periphery, Allee said, the world outside the canopy scrolled slowly past during the ESTOL approach at a pace that was "almost sedate."

The final landing was greeted with cheers in English and German from scores of test team members watching at runway's edge; since the beginning, VECTOR has been an international partnership between the Navy, Germany's Federal Office of Defense Technology and Procurement, European Aeronautic Defence and Space (EADS) Company, and Boeing Aerospace.

The program will now move into a data analysis and reporting stage, creating what will essentially be a how-to manual for thrust-vectored ESTOL and the technology demonstrated on the X-31.

Until German project test pilot Ruediger Knoepfel completed the first ESTOL landing here April 22, however, the technique was considered by many outside the program to be an unattainable ideal, said VECTOR Program Manager Jennifer Young.

"I don't know how many times we heard that this just couldn't be done," she said. "The cards were stacked against us for so long, and it was only the sheer determination and passion of everyone on the team that got us through."

Skepticism came from both sides of the ocean, according to EADS program manager Michael Jost.

"At the beginning of the program, the technology was looked on very critically, because a lot of (German) experts didn't believe it was possible," Jost said. "It put great pressure on the team to prove that it works and convince the non-believers."

On paper, descriptions of thrust-vectored ESTOL landings with the X-31 read a bit like science fiction. In order to land slower, the aircraft comes in at higher angles of attack - up to twice its typical 12 degrees - meaning its nose is pointed well above its direction of flight. At anything above 15 degrees angle of attack, the pilot loses sight of the runway.

"From the start of the approach, it is very obvious that the aircraft is sitting at a pretty extreme angle," Allee said. "You're still at one G, but you're leaning way back in the seat with the nose pointed way up at the sky."

More importantly, the tail of the aircraft is lower than the landing gear, requiring the X-31 to "derotate" and drop onto its wheels when the engine nozzle is just two feet above the runway.

Timing of that maneuver is critical. If the aircraft derotates early and drops too far, the landing gear could fail. If the aircraft derotates too late or too low, the tail could strike the runway with disastrous consequences. The solution was to automate the entire approach, requiring the pilot to fly into an invisible engagement box in the sky, then watch via a video camera in the belly of the plane as it flies itself to its remarkable touchdown. The system has to be accurate to within two centimeters.

"Everything has worked perfectly and far exceeded my expectations," Knoepfel said.

"We're getting real and very useful technology out of this program," Young said, "and it was a passionate belief in that fact that has kept this team going.

For related news, visit the NAVAIR - Naval Air Systems Command Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/navair.



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: miltech; pictures; vector
That's a pretty wild way to land. The nose is so high that the pilot can't see the runway. The plane has to straighten out at the last second so that the wheels hit before the tail.
1 posted on 05/02/2003 8:29:33 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *miltech
Ping!!
2 posted on 05/02/2003 8:30:34 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Needs longer gear legs.
3 posted on 05/02/2003 8:33:48 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Smokers are people too, most are good people. But Will Rogers never met me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Fantastic article bump!!
4 posted on 05/02/2003 8:36:19 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The new Joint Strike Fighter that Lockheed Martin is working on can take off and land vertically just like the harrier. But, unlike the harrier, it's supersonic. That's what a true Extremely Short Take-Off and Landing is. I forget which X plane number it is, but from what I've seen so far in the news, it's absolutely amazing.
5 posted on 05/02/2003 8:39:01 AM PDT by psstoffpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Didn't Clint Eastwood and Donald Sutherland pull the same manuveur with the space shuttle in the movie "Space Cowboys"?
6 posted on 05/02/2003 8:40:46 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Oops, I screwed up the Navair link. Try this: www.news.navy.mil/local/navair
7 posted on 05/02/2003 8:44:40 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: psstoffpatriot
Only the F-35B will be able to takeoff and land vertically. The A and C will not.
8 posted on 05/02/2003 8:44:53 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: psstoffpatriot
Even if VSTOL (vertical takeoff and landing) isn't required (since it is very, very inefficient and wsates fuel) extremely short takeoffs/landings are essential in getting back home if the runway is bombed, or has only recently been repaired.

Example: with a short landing capability, you can land on the taxiway or ramp, then wait for the bulldozers and concrete mixers to fix the main runway. With a short takeoff/extremely short takeoff ability, you can still get airborne during repairs if required.

The conventional jets would be locked in place as targets until the long runway is completely fixed.
9 posted on 05/02/2003 8:44:57 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: psstoffpatriot
The plane you're talking about is the X-35.


10 posted on 05/02/2003 8:47:53 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
That's one ugly aircraft.
11 posted on 05/02/2003 8:50:10 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
That's a fine circus trick for air shows, but I dont see how this is going to be practical for routine landings.

I expect to hear a lot about lost planes and lost pilots if this is mainstreamed.

12 posted on 05/02/2003 8:57:13 AM PDT by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Then you should have seen it's Boeing X-32 competitor for the contract. It's unofficial nickname was "Monica Lewinsky". (hint: Fat looking with a big mouth)

The X-35 is a babe in comparison


13 posted on 05/02/2003 9:01:10 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Anyone that considers 121 knots on approach to be 'sedate' is a bada$$.

I love all this STOL / high-performance TOL stuff. Most definate real-world practical applications.
14 posted on 05/02/2003 9:05:41 AM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend
That X-32 is one weird looking plane, especially that air inlet. Love the nickname, too.
15 posted on 05/02/2003 9:19:26 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
And the best looking plane ever designed was the YF-23 from Northrop....man, that's a sexy machine.


16 posted on 05/02/2003 11:09:14 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Baby's got back! LOL!!


17 posted on 05/02/2003 11:13:25 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I followed your link and got to looking around.

This is a great site, I found homecoming pictures of our troops and of President Bush from the USS Lincoln yesterday. They're all great and come in small, larger, and huge "download" size.

If you visit, and I recommend it highly, The Presidents pictures from 5/1 aren't all grouped together so go through the pictures for a bit.

There are several galleries, I found the Homecoming and Presidential pictures at:

http://www.news.navy.mil/view_photos.asp

Thanks for the link, Your Bellicosity is hereby excused.
18 posted on 05/02/2003 12:24:20 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Gawd. I'd be ashamed to be seen with that Boeing X-32. Not just ugly, but fugly.
19 posted on 05/02/2003 2:54:46 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson