Skip to comments.
The Idolatry of Ideology - Why Tax Cuts Hurt the Economy
alternatives ^
| Russ Beaton
Posted on 05/02/2003 7:55:36 AM PDT by please sir may i have a dollar
Edited on 05/02/2003 8:04:07 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
To: TBP
The question is: What does Russ Beaton?
To: familyofman
There's some cool stuff over there. Still haven't found actual year by year budget-vs-surplus over a useful length of time. Though that data might not be so greqt, remember Clinton's "budget surplus" was done by internal borrowing from SocSec and Medicaire which doesn't count as borrowing like selling t-bills.
42
posted on
05/02/2003 10:37:39 AM PDT
by
discostu
(A cow don't make ham)
To: discostu
"remember Clinton's "budget surplus" was done by internal borrowing from SocSec and Medicaire which doesn't count as borrowing like selling t-bills."
True, but imagine how much larger the current and projected deficits would be if they weren't partially offst by SS & Medicare surpluses. The accounting (smoke & mirrors) used by the US gov't is so obtuse that many times it puts Enron & Worldcom to shame - a cliche about liars & numbers comes to mind.
I'm going to check the Federal Reserve website to see what kind of historical #'s they have, I might even try some of the big bokerages houses i deal with have.
To: familyofman
But you still have to payback SocSec and Medicare (in theory anyway, you can always "repay" it the same way we "repay" t-bills), these intergovernmental loans work just like t-bills only they don't pay interest and they're hiddden in a corner of the ledger normal citizens don't look at. The money was still borrowed and still has to be paid back, as a bonus it's not being used by SocSec or Medicare in a way that could earn interest and help keep those program afloat, and it means the payback won't go to an American citizen (even though they just float more t-bills to pay t-bills at least the raw cash goes to a person as ROI). The "offset" would be more properly described as a lie, basically they're paying some things with MasterCard only showing us the Visa bill and claiming that's the entire deficit.
44
posted on
05/02/2003 10:57:44 AM PDT
by
discostu
(A cow don't make ham)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson