Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgians Plan Whites-Only Prom Party
Associated Press ^ | 05-01-03

Posted on 05/01/2003 11:47:05 AM PDT by Brian S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-349 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: shawne
"Due to the location...here we go again. Since they are located in Georgia, they must be racist! Can somebody say "DUer"?"

No, they're racists because they're racists, not because they live in Georgia. There are racists living everywhere. I know people who live in Georgia who aren't racists. I also know people in Georgia who are racists.

The folks being described in this story are racists, pure and simple. That's their right, of course, but that's what they are.
222 posted on 05/01/2003 2:37:43 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

Comment #223 Removed by Moderator

Comment #224 Removed by Moderator

To: KantianBurke
its their right to have their own white only prom

Yes. And it's our right (and responsibility) to shun them like cockroaches.

225 posted on 05/01/2003 2:40:34 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #226 Removed by Moderator

To: shawne
"Looky here...every one of those white students is racist!?! Damn, that is very insightful of you. So, is a black fraternity racist? I think it is fine. What about you?
"

Nope. The racists are the ones who want to have their own little prom without blacks being able to attend. There's no black fraternity in this story. There's another prom, where everyone's invited, but no black fraternity.

Do I think that a black fraternity that doesn't allow non-black members is racist? Yes, I do. I don't like racism. I don't like racists. I consider racists to be below the scum of the earth. Does that answer your question?
227 posted on 05/01/2003 2:43:16 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

Comment #228 Removed by Moderator

To: johnb838
Actually since it was in "gayman's" post, you posted to wrong person,

229 posted on 05/01/2003 2:44:30 PM PDT by DeathfromBelow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
"I bet those six families were conniving..."

I'd like to think most juniors aren't quite so controlled by inbred relatives.

Do you think it was six separate families, or just one really big family that's interlinked in several places? These are probably people who would marry their brothers before they married a black man.

230 posted on 05/01/2003 2:44:55 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: shawne
"Better yet, how about an all black college?"

Name one. Name a college that does not allow non-blacks to attend. I think you'll find that there are none.
231 posted on 05/01/2003 2:46:12 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: DeathfromBelow
Ooops.... :)
232 posted on 05/01/2003 2:46:24 PM PDT by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of American Anger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: shawne
You have got to be kidding?!?! ROFLMAO

Are you under the impression that rock music just appeared out of the blue with Bill Halley and the Comets?

233 posted on 05/01/2003 2:46:41 PM PDT by jmc813 (The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #234 Removed by Moderator

To: Brian S
Jesus. I didn't know there was such things these days.
235 posted on 05/01/2003 2:49:05 PM PDT by maxwell (Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shawne
"Yes it does, as long as you are not being one sided...bravo.
I, however, think that if a fraternity, which is private, wants to restrict access to a certain race...it IS NOT racist."

Wrong. It may have a perfect right to restrict membership to a certain race, but that does not mean it is not racist.

Any organization that restricts membership based on race is racist. It may not be illegal, but racist it is. I don't like racists. I support their right to be racists in private organizations, but I do not like them. I will not give any support to any racist organization. I will not buy products from any racist business.

Private organizations may do as they please. That does not mean they are right to do so.
236 posted on 05/01/2003 2:49:31 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
I don't think exclusion is a good thing personally but why is it that it's always White People who should make an effort to be inclusive? Why are White People always supposed to feel ashamed for being White?
237 posted on 05/01/2003 2:50:30 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
I don't understand why this is upsetting to Freepers. Didn't we just decide that it was okay to keep women out of golf clubs? By the same reasoning it's okay to keep blacks out of proms. Where's Hootie? He'll explain it all.

This is not a valid comparison.

The question is not whether they have the right to discriminate (both do) but whether the discrimination is such a terrible thing. Racial segregation is much worse than gender separation. In fact, women are allowed to play at Augusta if they're invited by a member, just not to be members of the club. If Augusta did not want to allow blacks to become members, FReepers would be up in arms about it. Whether they have a right to do something like be a whites-only club is not the same as whether they are morally right. If the kids wanted to hold single-gender proms (a guys' prom and a girls' prom) FReepers would not blink an eyeball.

Discrimination on the basis of race and discrimination on the basis of gender are two very different things. Don't try to equate them, because it just doesn't work.

238 posted on 05/01/2003 2:51:11 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
Because White Liberals feel guilty and to assuage their guilt, they try to make all other whites feel guilty too.
239 posted on 05/01/2003 2:52:16 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
I don't think exclusion is a good thing personally but why is it that it's always White People who should make an effort to be inclusive? Why are White People always supposed to feel ashamed for being White?

White People (if you insist on the capitalization) in this instance are not being asked to "make an effort to be inclusive"--they are being asked to NOT make an effort to be exclusive! These White People are going out of their way to make black kids feel bad, of course we will blame them in this instance.

240 posted on 05/01/2003 2:52:42 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson