Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Georgians Plan Whites-Only Prom Party
Associated Press ^ | 05-01-03

Posted on 05/01/2003 11:47:05 AM PDT by Brian S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last
To: Brian S
Problems of inter-racial dating?

My white mother married my Native American father.

Sure glad she didn't have hicks in her family.
21 posted on 05/01/2003 12:01:54 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Not if this is a public school.
22 posted on 05/01/2003 12:02:59 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
I don't understand why this is upsetting to Freepers. Didn't we just decide that it was okay to keep women out of golf clubs? By the same reasoning it's okay to keep blacks out of proms. Where's Hootie? He'll explain it all.
23 posted on 05/01/2003 12:03:22 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
C-SPAN had a phone-in segment a few days ago where they only accepted calls from minorities.
24 posted on 05/01/2003 12:03:23 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Agreed.
25 posted on 05/01/2003 12:03:58 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
the bi-racial prom that's being organizd by the school is public. The racist one is technically a private party. Thus they have every right to act like rednecks and we have every right to call them on it.
26 posted on 05/01/2003 12:04:34 PM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
It's not on public school grounds...
27 posted on 05/01/2003 12:04:39 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Me thinks the parents put the Juniors up to this because they are hicks.

I bet those six families were conniving about how to plan this all year.
28 posted on 05/01/2003 12:05:41 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Oh, goodness. They're gonna destroy our heritage.
29 posted on 05/01/2003 12:06:15 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: geaux
Jeez! Are you kidding me?

I must be out of the loop big time (I don't have kids).
30 posted on 05/01/2003 12:06:35 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
No matter what the percentages are, it will always be freedom of association.

No one has a right to go to a private party they are not invited to.
31 posted on 05/01/2003 12:06:59 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
"Me thinks the parents put the Juniors up to this because they are hicks.

I bet those six families were conniving about how to plan this all year."

I'll bet you're right. What a sad thing for their children, to have to grow up in a racist household. I do hope they learn better when they move out and grow up.

Dumb, dumb, dumb.
32 posted on 05/01/2003 12:07:17 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BADROTOFINGER
Good point. I missed that.

This is bizarre.
33 posted on 05/01/2003 12:08:14 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
"No one has a right to go to a private party they are not invited to."

I don't think anyone's arguing with that. It's just that what these kids are doing is just stupid. They can do it if they want, but it'd be really nice if nobody showed up for their little racist prom.
34 posted on 05/01/2003 12:08:37 PM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: ladyjane
Private club, public school.

Big difference.
36 posted on 05/01/2003 12:09:41 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
nah, it is just "freedom of association" as protected under the 1stAmendment, so it isn't "wrong".
It does appear to be silly, however.
*shrugging*
37 posted on 05/01/2003 12:09:48 PM PDT by demosthenes the elder (If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
I don't think you're the one who's out of the loop; I think that highschool is the one that needs to catch up with the times. The thing that really surprised me was that the ACLU was nowhere to be seen.
38 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:02 PM PDT by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
I understand that. I'm just surprised that in the year 2003 anything like freedom of association still exists. I'm surprised that lawyers haven't already flocked to the scene. Shocked, I tell ya!
39 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:03 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
I got it.
40 posted on 05/01/2003 12:10:14 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson