Skip to comments.
Georgians Plan Whites-Only Prom Party
Associated Press ^
| 05-01-03
Posted on 05/01/2003 11:47:05 AM PDT by Brian S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 341-349 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator
To: shawne
"Due to the location...here we go again. Since they are located in Georgia, they must be racist! Can somebody say "DUer"?"
No, they're racists because they're racists, not because they live in Georgia. There are racists living everywhere. I know people who live in Georgia who aren't racists. I also know people in Georgia who are racists.
The folks being described in this story are racists, pure and simple. That's their right, of course, but that's what they are.
Comment #223 Removed by Moderator
Comment #224 Removed by Moderator
To: KantianBurke
its their right to have their own white only promYes. And it's our right (and responsibility) to shun them like cockroaches.
225
posted on
05/01/2003 2:40:34 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
Comment #226 Removed by Moderator
To: shawne
"Looky here...every one of those white students is racist!?! Damn, that is very insightful of you. So, is a black fraternity racist? I think it is fine. What about you?
"
Nope. The racists are the ones who want to have their own little prom without blacks being able to attend. There's no black fraternity in this story. There's another prom, where everyone's invited, but no black fraternity.
Do I think that a black fraternity that doesn't allow non-black members is racist? Yes, I do. I don't like racism. I don't like racists. I consider racists to be below the scum of the earth. Does that answer your question?
Comment #228 Removed by Moderator
To: johnb838
Actually since it was in "gayman's" post, you posted to wrong person,
To: headsonpikes
"I bet those six families were conniving..."I'd like to think most juniors aren't quite so controlled by inbred relatives.
Do you think it was six separate families, or just one really big family that's interlinked in several places? These are probably people who would marry their brothers before they married a black man.
230
posted on
05/01/2003 2:44:55 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: shawne
"Better yet, how about an all black college?"
Name one. Name a college that does not allow non-blacks to attend. I think you'll find that there are none.
To: DeathfromBelow
Ooops.... :)
232
posted on
05/01/2003 2:46:24 PM PDT
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of American Anger)
To: shawne
You have got to be kidding?!?! ROFLMAOAre you under the impression that rock music just appeared out of the blue with Bill Halley and the Comets?
233
posted on
05/01/2003 2:46:41 PM PDT
by
jmc813
(The average citizen in Baghdad,right now, has more firearm rights than anyone in our country.)
Comment #234 Removed by Moderator
To: Brian S
Jesus. I didn't know there was such things these days.
235
posted on
05/01/2003 2:49:05 PM PDT
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: shawne
"Yes it does, as long as you are not being one sided...bravo.
I, however, think that if a fraternity, which is private, wants to restrict access to a certain race...it IS NOT racist."
Wrong. It may have a perfect right to restrict membership to a certain race, but that does not mean it is not racist.
Any organization that restricts membership based on race is racist. It may not be illegal, but racist it is. I don't like racists. I support their right to be racists in private organizations, but I do not like them. I will not give any support to any racist organization. I will not buy products from any racist business.
Private organizations may do as they please. That does not mean they are right to do so.
To: Guillermo
I don't think exclusion is a good thing personally but why is it that it's always White People who should make an effort to be inclusive? Why are White People always supposed to feel ashamed for being White?
To: ladyjane
I don't understand why this is upsetting to Freepers. Didn't we just decide that it was okay to keep women out of golf clubs? By the same reasoning it's okay to keep blacks out of proms. Where's Hootie? He'll explain it all.This is not a valid comparison.
The question is not whether they have the right to discriminate (both do) but whether the discrimination is such a terrible thing. Racial segregation is much worse than gender separation. In fact, women are allowed to play at Augusta if they're invited by a member, just not to be members of the club. If Augusta did not want to allow blacks to become members, FReepers would be up in arms about it. Whether they have a right to do something like be a whites-only club is not the same as whether they are morally right. If the kids wanted to hold single-gender proms (a guys' prom and a girls' prom) FReepers would not blink an eyeball.
Discrimination on the basis of race and discrimination on the basis of gender are two very different things. Don't try to equate them, because it just doesn't work.
238
posted on
05/01/2003 2:51:11 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: dljordan
Because White Liberals feel guilty and to assuage their guilt, they try to make all other whites feel guilty too.
239
posted on
05/01/2003 2:52:16 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(Sic 'em!)
To: dljordan
I don't think exclusion is a good thing personally but why is it that it's always White People who should make an effort to be inclusive? Why are White People always supposed to feel ashamed for being White?White People (if you insist on the capitalization) in this instance are not being asked to "make an effort to be inclusive"--they are being asked to NOT make an effort to be exclusive! These White People are going out of their way to make black kids feel bad, of course we will blame them in this instance.
240
posted on
05/01/2003 2:52:42 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 341-349 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson