Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exmarine
I don't remember any mention of Christianity in the constitution of the US. Crime statistics in the 17th century are as relative to the time and place as are todays morals. As I said, in almost every instance of nation building, it has been acceptable practice to enslave, run-off, and even kill the indigenous peoples, regardless of whether they were far from perfect or not. The conquering people impose their own set of moral absolutes on the ones that lost.
622 posted on 05/06/2003 11:45:38 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies ]


To: stuartcr
I don't remember any mention of Christianity in the constitution of the US. Crime statistics in the 17th century are as relative to the time and place as are todays morals. As I said, in almost every instance of nation building, it has been acceptable practice to enslave, run-off, and even kill the indigenous peoples, regardless of whether they were far from perfect or not. The conquering people impose their own set of moral absolutes on the ones that lost.

The Constitution ends with "In the Year of our Lord" - who is Lord? The Constitution embodies the principles from the Declaration of Independence - these two docs go hand in hand. Check the bill of rights - we know that the founders believed freedom to be an unalienable right from God.

You can't impose "your own set of moral absolutes" because there is only one set and it is from God, not man. Your point about human evil merely strengthens my argument about the purpose of the moral law - to drive people to Christ. All men have blown it - this is absolutely consistent with Christian teachings. The institutions of mankind are flawed at best and brutally evil at worst. This does not disprove the existence of moral absolutes or a universal moral standard, it merely serves to show that no man can perfectly live up to them. You are looking at governments, try looking at some individuals and see their integrity and honesty and compassion - Washington for one. There is a clear difference in the behavior of an avowed relativist (Marquis de Sade) as compared to a moral absolutist (Washington). How do you explain that? There are men who are moral and do the right thing most of the time - Washington was one of those, and so were many of our founders.

625 posted on 05/06/2003 12:47:56 PM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson