To: tpaine
Ah, so this is the formal proof of it, then? Let's see if I have the form right:
1) Definition one.
2) Definition two.
3) Non sequitur.
Did I leave anything out?
448 posted on
05/02/2003 1:20:23 PM PDT by
general_re
(Take care of the luxuries and the necessities will take care of themselves.)
To: general_re
Yep, any reasoning on your part was 'left out'.
You can't rebut common sense with word-play, 'general'ly speaking.
454 posted on
05/02/2003 1:37:33 PM PDT by
tpaine
(Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weak.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson