High probabilities are not objective proof. Indeed, there are plenty of examples -- both ways -- to demonstrate that "good nutrition" is neither necessary, nor sufficient to ensure good health. And of course, the definition of "good nutrition" is itself a rather subjective thing.
Just because you can't admit the truth, doesn't make you any less wrong.
Do you even admit a high correlation between "high probability" and "true"?
You act as if "probability" has no meaning . . .