Point blank -- are you actually claiming that "good" health is not objectively "better" than "bad" health, all other things being equal?
I'm not claiming anything. I was merely pointing out that your equating good eating with good health is not universally true.
And I can't help noticing those little quotation marks of yours around "good" and "bad." It's as if you already realize that the definitions of good and bad, as regard health, do not easily lend themselves to objective definition.