[Dominic Harr]

Ideal -- it's a simple enough line that has been drawn:

If "good" health is objectively better than "bad" health, then ya'lls arguments are exposed.

Arguing no one can objectively prove anything is pure sophistry, and does not fly with real thinkers, in my experience.

[general_re]

If "good" health is objectively better than "bad" health, then ya'lls arguments are exposed.

Yup. Good luck proving it.

Arguing no one can objectively prove anything is pure sophistry

And when you run into such a person, you will rightly point that out to them. On the other hand, that doesn't help you much with someone who only argues that some things cannot be objectively proven.