Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Kerchief
Objectivism does not accept any assumption as an axiom.

Really? When did it abandon the non-initiation of force principle?

303 posted on 05/01/2003 7:16:24 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe; unspun; general_re; The Westerner; RJCogburn; tpaine; exmarine; r9etb
Objectivism does not accept any assumption as an axiom.

Really? When did it abandon the non-initiation of force principle?

You will not find in any objectivist literature the principle that describes any "non-initaion of force," axiom. The principle that says, in relationships between human beings, it is the initiation of the use of force that is morally repugnant, is to differentiate it from the use of force in defence against its initiation. It is never described as an axiom.

The principle is based entirely on the nature or human beings and the requirements of their nature for their survival. Humans, to live and survive must be free to think and choose their behavior. The initiation of the use of force prohibits them from carrying out that process.

But, never mind. All of this is for those who are not terrified of being entirely responsible for themselves and their own lives. It is not for you.

Hank

312 posted on 05/01/2003 7:40:46 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson