Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
Even if you think you can inductively reason your way into axioms, you're just pushing the assumption back a step by assuming that the inductive principle is itself true, when it is definitely unproven, and probably unprovable.

No problem. Just call the assumptions self-evident.

297 posted on 05/01/2003 6:58:03 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
"call the assumptions self-evident."
-roscoe-


Backed by our constitutional experience, they have been proven self evident.



300 posted on 05/01/2003 7:11:38 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
Just call the assumptions self-evident.

One would think that a completely objective philosophy shouldn't need that sort of crutch, but there you go. Even Thomas Jefferson didn't claim that "these truths are self-evident", merely that "we hold these truths to be self-evident". And TJ was no dummy - presumably, if he could have proven them, he would have...

301 posted on 05/01/2003 7:14:24 PM PDT by general_re (Take care of the luxuries and the necessities will take care of themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson