[tpaine]

The argument is about whether we humans have a moral right to do to each other what we do to other species, and what other members of species do to each other.

The evidence in this regard points to the conclusion that it is OK, "if you can get away with it."

In order for your position to have any merit, we are required somehow to set mankind apart from the processes that are valid and operative from all of those other products of evolution.
147 -r9-


We set mankind apart long ago in our constitution.
The evidence shows that our rule of law works.
There is no evidence to your conclusion that Rand advocates anarchy or that ~it's~ OK, "if you can get away with it."

[r9etb]

We set mankind apart long ago in our constitution. The evidence shows that our rule of law works. There is no evidence to your conclusion that Rand advocates anarchy or that ~it's~ OK, "if you can get away with it."

Back to the kiddie pool with you, tippie. If you can't even correctly summarize the discussion, you have no business discussing it.