Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Iranians openly calling for American help in Iran.
Iranian Press Service ^ | 4.30.2003 | Iranian Press Service

Posted on 05/01/2003 12:27:52 AM PDT by DoctorZIn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: DoctorZIn
"The Iranian government has been using French technology to jam the [pro-Democracy] broadcasts."

You don't say?! Sources on this?

41 posted on 05/01/2003 8:13:12 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
You may be right, but I question how deep the "fanaticism" of the Republican Guard runs. How many participate in the fist pumping and flag burning just to get along, but are privately, or at least potentially, hostile toward the regime?

I don't really know for certain.

However, one thing to keep in mind was that the Iraqi regime was secular and the Iraqi Republican Guard thought they answered to Saddam while the Iranian Revolutionary Guards are very religious and belive they answer to Allah.

If I were an Iranian student going off to a demonstration to do potential battle with a religious zealot, I wouldn't leave home without my AK-47 and my RPG......and 20 of my closest, similarly armed friends. :-)

42 posted on 05/01/2003 8:32:04 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Re: French jamming technology being used in Iran.

I read this report from an Iranian press report months ago.
I need to see if I can source this for you.

I remember they named the French firm responsible for the technology sale to the Iranian government. (I believe the name of the firm started with a "V."

I need to get access to Lexis-Nexis.

Iranians are getting frustrated with the French because the French are trying to prop up the mullahs and the freedom fighters in Iran strongly oppose this.
43 posted on 05/01/2003 8:42:59 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; Stultis

Here's a cryptic reference  to the jamming from radiofarda.com (3/10/03):

Young Iranians Listen to "Great Satan" on Radio Farda

* Young Iranians listen to Radio Farda using small pocket receivers and earphones, according to the Italian daily Courier de la Serra's Tehran-based correspondent, who writes that Radio Farda is the most popular radio among young listeners. Despite the official ban on satellite TV receivers, the price of satellite dish and receiver has dropped to $150, and millions watch US-based Persian-language satellite programs that air interviews with former crown prince Reza Pahlavi. More than 5 million Iranians are connected to the Internet. Most log-on using Internet connection prepaid cards that allow anonymity. As the regime's officials continue to condemn the US as the Great Satan, it appears that the young Iranians secretly harbor a deep affection for the US. (Ahmad Ra'fat, Rome)

* Communications minister Ahmad Motamedi said his ministry does not know the source of the jamming of satellite and radio signals that block the US-based TV and radio programs, including Radio Farda, in some areas of Tehran and other big cities. He said the jamming interferes with Iran's own telephone, radio and satellite communications. His statement indicates that organs within the Islamic regime but outside the control of Khatami's government jam the US-based broadcasts to Iran. (Ali Sajjadi)


44 posted on 05/01/2003 8:51:02 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Good post! Thanks!

BTTT!

45 posted on 05/01/2003 9:01:14 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Never have so many been so wrong about so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
BUMP!
46 posted on 05/01/2003 10:55:31 AM PDT by HighRoadToChina (Never Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I have my fingers crossed.
This news supplements word of mouth I have been getting for the past two years from Iranian friends.
This might still be false. Hard to tell... but: I have my fingers most fervently crossed.
47 posted on 05/01/2003 11:55:15 AM PDT by demosthenes the elder (If *I* can afford $5/month to support FR: SO CAN YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
"The Afghans and the Iraqis have been freed from dictatorships, why not us?" a filmmaker said.

We here in California feel the same way.

48 posted on 05/01/2003 12:20:56 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
Wait and see. No active operations are necessary in Iran. The Khatami government and a growing percentage of the most conservative parts of the clerics have the same agenda: the separation of state and church (= religion) as bad governance is tainting the beliefs and hurt the trust in the Shi’ite interpretation of the Qu’ran. There is no papacy in Islam and not even cardinals; hence the present-day Iran is a deviation from all Islamic precedent. The mollahs will go back to the mosques and Iran will retract from the fundamentalist line of Ruhollah Komeini. Naturally, some groups in Iran are against this, as they will loose their power and thus their source of money.

The coming two years will truly be interesting.

Remember that Mohammed was a merchant that became an established businessman by marrying a rich older widow. If I had the time I would participate in establishing a task group that would investigate the economic thoughts of the foundation of Islam and free enterprise and thus free market economy. This will probably have an impact in the future Iraq and Iran.

If any of you have ideas for this mail me.
49 posted on 05/01/2003 12:45:46 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Argus
We must get rid of "Sacremento Hussein" and his Caliban!
50 posted on 05/01/2003 4:06:57 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Mr. Ali Sa’idi, the acting Representative of the leader at the Army of the Guards of the Islamic Revolution, better known as Pasdaran, or Revolutionary Guards.

I've been told that the Pasdaran are generally not Persian but Arab. Though I'm no expert in such things, to me Mr. Ali Sa'idi's name looks much more Arab than Persian.

51 posted on 05/01/2003 5:18:49 PM PDT by Eala (irrelevant (î-rèl´e-vent) 1: The UN 2: France 3: CNN 4: Tim Robbins 5: Chretien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
We should be revamping and revitalize the CIA to help them get their country back away from the Mullahs. The sooner the better. The staged demonstrations in Iraq so far have almost all been orchestrated by the Iranian dabr squads sent in with mullah-shock troops to sow anti-american strife in Iraq. If Iran were to fall, these last remnants of their regime would likely take a powder...just like Saddam himself.
52 posted on 05/01/2003 9:48:29 PM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
The fear that the military of Iran will kill its own people is real but not likely. The military and the revolutionary guards have members on both sides of the struggle. There have been numerous reports of the revolutionary guards calling emergency meeting with the Iranian leaders warning of a civil war if they try to ask them to crack down too violently on the student protesters.

I

53 posted on 05/01/2003 10:09:11 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
"The Khatami government and a growing percentage of the most conservative parts of the clerics have the same agenda: the separation of state and church "

While Khatami wants some greater freedom, such as freedom of the press, I have heard little from him that indicates his desire for seperation of mosque and state. Other mullahs do hold this postion but I would like to see where Khatami has done so.

54 posted on 05/01/2003 10:19:16 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
"At least their version of Hollywood has someone with half a brain. "

ROFL!! Well said.
55 posted on 05/01/2003 10:48:23 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
The power hungry, thug, clerics are the real problem in the Middle East.
56 posted on 05/01/2003 10:55:15 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
The former president also lambasted the Americans on their "cooperation" with Iraq-based terrorist Mojahedin Khalq Organisation (MKO), saying that it "indicates Washington's hypocrisy in the international campaign against terrorism".

Dont you just love this. Here is the leader , a religious man, supporting suicide bombers in Israel, supporting terrorist groups up the ying yang and he has a pair to come up with this crap.. HEY BUDDY 2 sentences for ya...payback is a bitch....what goes around comes around...

can we send iraqi tv signals into iran to show them the changes that are and will take place....???
57 posted on 05/02/2003 1:05:44 AM PDT by Irishguy (League of Nations (version 1.1 BETA) currently in user testing...problems reported)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: takeashiitebaath
Sorry, I didn't mean to generalize quite so much. I know that some were sincere, if naive. But many, many of the leaders - for example Putin, Chirac, Galloway - as well as the more rabid leftists in this country, i.e. ANSWER, are purely anti-American in their intentions, yet they wrap themselves up as "peace" lovers.

So at a given "peace" rally in America, the majority probably sincerely wanted peace and were simply misled into thinking that somehow the status quo was "peaceful", while chances are the speakers at the rally or those who funded the rally were anti-Americans with a peace facade.

In reality Gulf War I hadn't really been finished, and the clock was just ticking until Saddam and Al Queda came up with another assymetrical tactic against us, in the manner that Saddam was actively funding the murder of Israelis (whose lives seem to be meaningless to "peace activists").

Hopefully some of those who were "for peace" have woken up by seeing the outcome of the conflict. It will be quite interesting to see what comes out of Iraq in terms of the collaboration between leading "peace activists" and Saddam's regime.

59 posted on 05/02/2003 1:53:06 AM PDT by EaglesUpForever (Boycott france and russia for at least 20 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn
Yes, Khatami has not, as far as I know, on the record said that the purpose is the separation of mosque and state. However, this will be the result in a few years time.

Take for instance the recent bill to remove the extra authority the fifth parliament gave to the Guardians Council to examine the qualification of candidates running for parliamentary election, i.e. the religious vetting of the candidates.

http://www.irna.com/en/tnews/030430180554.etn09.shtml

For additional background on the origins of the reformists in Iran see for instance Middle East Intelligence Bulletin
http://www.meib.org/articles/0304_iran.htm
60 posted on 05/04/2003 2:12:41 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson