Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
A careful reading of the article shows that Greenspand didn't oppose the tax cuts. He said they should be offset, by CUTTING SPENDING. Damn reporters.
2 posted on 04/30/2003 7:42:00 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines
I agree; when I first saw the headline, I was surprised. I saw the comments he made, and all he said was he would like to see more spending cuts to offset the tax cuts.

But ... I didn't think he undercut the tax cuts at all.
3 posted on 04/30/2003 7:47:08 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I agree. And other articles on the subject today have similar titles. What Greenspan is trying to undercut is the rapid growth in government spending.
4 posted on 04/30/2003 7:50:44 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; Moonman62
CUTTING SPENDING *-?

What a novel idea! This is something California definitely is not leading the nation at...and should be!

6 posted on 04/30/2003 8:03:26 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi .. Support FRee Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson