Replies

"The existence of the particle is not a surprise, but its mass is lower than expected. This result will send theorists back to their drawing boards."

The atheist Einsteinians keep changing their theories. It's obvious that "particle physics" is only partly science. They believe it like some people believe religion. How could so many billions of particles all act on their own to follow the laws of nature? What a silly thing to suggest. Obviously, the correct and scientific theory is "intelligent manipulation"--the guiding hand of some higher power moves the molecules Himself. That theory hasn't changed in a hundred years--which is proof that it's more scientifically valid than "Einsteinian" particle physics. The scientists keep changing their minds--is that really scientific?

Einstein wasn't an atheist. All scientific theories undergo change, that's the scientific method. Many physicists believe in God. The laws of nature are mere models/approximations of the way the universe works, the universe doesn't "obey" them. "Intelligent manipulation", whatever that is, is not a scientific theory. Molecules are not particles. Einstein didn't invent particle physics, and definitely not quantum physics. He didn't even like some of its conclusions. "Proof by assertion" is not a valid basis for scientific reasoning.

Apart from that your post was accurate.