Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pram
Well, you certainly have much more interest in and to know so much more about all these practices than I.

I don't frequent them and, in fact, avoid them and people who frequent them, but I do realize there are all kinds of ads, sites and other unpleasant materials one can seek out that cater to all kinds of sexual proclivities from hard to imagine foot fetishes to disgusting pictures of little girls...but assuming one stumbled across an example (why else would one know where to find such a thing and why would one dwell long enough to learn what it says or shows?)it won't be proof that there is a universal consumption among its target audience who are members of a larger group.

For example, I don't associate all heterosexual men with porno' magazines or the sex trade in teen girls that caters to a few of them.

Nothing of any value comes from dwelling on extremes of behavior in a discussion of entire group, all that happens is that we throw ugly examples back & forth to top one another.
234 posted on 05/12/2003 9:23:28 AM PDT by nastypumps (nastypumps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: nastypumps
The main point I was making was not about anyone's sick sexual practices but about homosexual activists' methods of indoctrination, infiltration and proselityzing. The homo activists have made no secret of their methods of lying, exaggeration, deceit, infiltration, forceful aggression and out and out dishonesty. That is the Nazi comparison, as well as using Mein Kampf for inspiration and techniques of control.
Additionally, the percentage of homosexuals engaged in sick sexual practices is huge; the number of similarly engaged heterosexuals is much smaller.
236 posted on 05/12/2003 10:05:55 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: nastypumps
I'm late reading email & apologize; but I still don't get it...do you mean something called "society", outside of ourselves and the institutions (real & virtual) that we create, makes rules we should follow--just because?
If we are not "society" (defined by Webster's as: "the totality of of social relationships among human beings...the institutions and culture of a distinct, self-perpetuating group...")who or what is...and why would we be following their/its rules...what if they/it are wrong?
238 posted on 05/16/2003 1:28:28 PM PDT by nastypumps (nastypumps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson