Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: new cruelty
Someone should rent an apartment that allows pets (preferably from a GLBT landlord) and mention that they sleep with their dog. After all, the city couldn't possibly allow "discrimination", could they. If they're refused, sue for a gazillion.
191 posted on
05/06/2003 9:02:43 AM PDT by
jimt
(Is your church BATF approved?)
To: new cruelty
So "discrimination" is wrong. How about discrimination against pedophiles and rapists??
192 posted on
05/06/2003 9:03:57 AM PDT by
ZULU
To: new cruelty
This law restricts the liberty of citizens of the community who own property and businesses. It is religious discrimination, as well.
The right to rent or have a job is not equal to the right to have liberty in the use of your own property. If so, can I demand the property or job that I want?
This government has proven itself illegitimate because it has acted to infringe the rights of the citizens who give it its power.
215 posted on
05/08/2003 9:27:52 PM PDT by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
To: new cruelty
It appears that on top of the rights and protections all citizens possess, gays and lesbians now possess a higher level of rights and protections enabling the thought police to say what the motive for the crime will be, like homophilia and hatred, making any and all small infractions hate crimes against the gay community. Sounds fruity to me!
219 posted on
05/09/2003 5:12:16 AM PDT by
wingnuts'nbolts
(You've no idea how uncommon commonsense is arpind here)
To: new cruelty
So the mayor's a butch? No wonder she couldn't wait to pass this ordinance.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson