To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So, we not oly have more and better equipment. We can use it more efficiently than anybody else!
3 posted on
04/29/2003 5:49:39 PM PDT by
glorgau
To: glorgau
"So, we not oly have more and better equipment. We can use it more efficiently than anybody else!" And the thing of it is "you ain't seen nothin' yet!" is the operative word. The stuff under test and on the drawing board makes today's computer data handling look like the latest Pentium vs. the 4004 chip. The level of technology is accelerating, not holding steady.
To: glorgau
Not only that, we also have the logistic to take care of it too. It would cost the world billions to even try to catch up with us, and then billions more just to be able to move it from place to place, and billions more to be able to supply their forces.
If the rest of the world wants to get into an arms race with us, they better plan on spending about 75% of their GNP on weapons systems.
To: glorgau
"So, we not oly have more and better equipment. We can use it more efficiently than anybody else!"
But not for long. Remember, we may not be the world's most powerful country very long. Especially if the dems get their way. We need to let China take a turn, then Zimbabwe, then Haiti, then Andorra, then St. Peter & Paul's Rocks...then Paris.
19 posted on
04/29/2003 7:55:31 PM PDT by
lawdude
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson