[Not Insane]

Your analogies are all flawed in the same way - they try to relate the virtual to the physical.

One last time: The squatters are not in YOUR house. They are in a COPY of your house.

[Poohbah]

Your analogies are all flawed in the same way - they try to relate the virtual to the physical.

Either property rights are real and enforceable, in ALL cases, or they are void and unenforceable.

Which one is it?

One last time: The squatters are not in YOUR house. They are in a COPY of your house.

The issue is the same: ownership of a specific asset, be it physical (my house) or nonphysical (copyright).

In each case, I am being denied the benefits of controlling the use, abuse, and disposal of my property.