Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
Constitution says "Declare War", not "resolution of force"."

Does the Constitution says what form the declaration must take? Or the wording it must contain? NO

64 posted on 04/29/2003 2:29:33 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
<< Constitution says "Declare War", not "resolution of force"."
Does the Constitution says what form the declaration must take? Or the wording it must contain? NO >>

But the fact that Congress rejected Paul's rider to make it a declaration indicates that they knew their's wasn't - otherwise they had NO reason to reject Paul's rider making it an official Constitutional declaration.

Now people like Hillary can play both sides. She can say she was against the war and against Bush even though she voted to give Bush dictatorial powers to wage unlimited war. If she had to vote on an actual declaration, she'd be accountable for her vote one way or the other.
72 posted on 04/29/2003 2:37:06 PM PDT by Con X-Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: capitan_refugio
Does the Constitution says what form the declaration must take? Or the wording it must contain? NO

Then why was "Resolution of Force" used instead of "Declare War"?

122 posted on 04/30/2003 5:38:17 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (If I keep my eyes on Jesus, I could walk on water - Audio Adrenaline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson