To: Beenliedto
I saw his reason. The difference between myself and Paul is that I don't chose my support on how things OUGHT to be in a perfect world. I look at how things are, and how to ACHIEVE them.
I fight to win, and if that means cut a few corners to get to get the pro-rights results needed, so be it. The trial lawyers want to litigate gun manufacturers out of business. That needs to be stopped by any means necessary.
30 posted on
04/29/2003 1:31:45 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("I have two guns. One for each of ya." - Doc Holliday)
To: Dan from Michigan
Do the ends justify the means? Did you throw the baby out with the bath water? Want some more aphorisms?
36 posted on
04/29/2003 1:37:50 PM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dan from Michigan
Dan from Michigan said: 'The trial lawyers want to litigate gun manufacturers out of business. That needs to be stopped by any means necessary."
I am actually opposed, as a matter of principle, to the summary execution without trial of trial lawyers. This is despite any benefits which might be obtained by such.
To: Dan from Michigan
The trial lawyers want to litigate gun manufacturers out of business. That needs to be stopped by any means necessary.As I said, vote ONLY for candidates who support Second Amendment rights, at every level.
And NOT just for those who, like Mr. Bush, say they support it and then by their deeds do not.
When 40,000,000 of us do that, the Constitution and our liberties will long survive.
If you want to debate the validity of this notion's importance, please note that the Founders thought is second only after speech.
82 posted on
04/29/2003 3:13:26 PM PDT by
Beenliedto
(Class of '98)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson