[ArGee]

I don't know if you were replying to me or to the thread.

If I said, "If you allow (gay) consensual behavior based on privacy then you allow eatiing, sleaping, showering, or watching T.V." would people howl? Of cours not, because there is nothing immoral about any of those things.

Santorum picked four well recognized immoral acts. The homosexual community, which seems to not understand the concept of immorality, got mad to have their act lumped in with those others. Why? Show me one moral code practiced anywhere in the world that doesn't make homosexuality as immoral as bigamy, polygamy, adultery, and incest? There isn't one, which means that it was perfectly reasonable to lump homosexual behavior in with the other four.

The homosexuals are ticked off because it reminds everyone that homosexuality is immoral.

Shalom.

[longtermmemmory]

If genetic homosexuality has to be accepted due to lacke of choice. (then fetuses get aborted and gene therapies developed)

If environmental then it can be prevented. It becomes an affirmative choice which can moaralized.

The entire homosexual behavior movement is geared on the choice model. They act as if it is a choice and work to desensitize the 99+% straight population. That is why they are so frantic to get acceptance before science catches up to the politics.