Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aric2000
Then this detractor troll, will begin to call you names as well, accuse you of all sorts of interesting things.

That is a good one! Nearly all of Aric2000's messages are laced with insults and name-calling and now he wants to whine about other people doing it. Amazing.

I and others were discussing BIOLOGICAL evolution, these 2 disruptor/Trolls came in discussing COSMOLOGICAL evolution, 2 different things.

Remember, Aric2000 is intellectually dishonest. The reality of the situation is Aric2000 was sniping from the sidelines - a thread developed related to what should be taught in school - somebody stated no cosmological theories can be proven so it would be a good idea to present both religion-based cosmological theories and evolution-based cosmological theories and let the students decide (in the context of cosmology and not biology)– Aric2000 started sniping from the sidelines that cosmology has nothing to do with evolution and the food fight started – after decimating that debate Aric2000 turned to insults than the disrupts patted each other on the back – when Aric2000’s snipes were proven to be factually “inconsistent” he started whining that the debate was about biological evolution and the other person was “wrong” for even bringing up cosmology (as if Aric2000 is King of FreeRepublic and he controls the topics of all debates)

The Darwinist disrupters arrogantly think they know-it-all. Thinking the “science” side of the debate has all the answers they arrogantly disrupt all debates related evolution by sniping from the sidelines – the reality is science currently does not have all the answers and their arrogance drives them to make factually incorrect and often absurd statements (like biological evolution has nothing to do with cosmology). These disrupters are not interested in exchanging ideals and challenging their beliefs – they assume they are correct and they snipe at anybody that does not agree with their intellectually rigid and narrow-minded approach to the subject.

812 posted on 05/16/2003 6:47:47 AM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog
Thinking the “science” side of the debate has all the answers...

That's the problem! They don't have the answers. That's why there are so many scientists who think evilution is bunk.

Dissent

FRegards, MM

816 posted on 05/16/2003 7:38:26 AM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson