[whattajoke]

You choose to have "criteria" you never use. You want to prove a theory...(first clue, it is a theory). You chose to ignore better and easier criteria.

Please refer to my post 634 before using the "it's only a theory drivel."

"Easier," I'll buy. "Better?" Not for a millisecond. "Goddidit" is admittedly far easier than 140 years of legit scientific research, backed up by voluminous studies, peer reviewed journals, and countless documentation. Why bother learning anything? "Goddidit!" (Except in the case of those damned fossils... "Satandidat!") So we agree... your childish fantasy world of "Zap, Goddidit" is indeed far easier than reality. Ahem.

And when confronted with the ideas, you stick your head in the sand.

Maybe I missed that part. I have yet to actually see a creationist (aka ID proponent) put forth a single new idea. Please do so and I'll wipe the sand from my hair and review what you've got.

In the meantime, I'll be preparing for Halley's Comet.

[Heartlander]

"Goddidit"

(or mother nature got it on with father time in the back of a 15 billion year old Buick from out of nowhere)

…or

bioGenesis 1:1 …and on the 2 billionth day, nature accidentally puked forth chemicals and looked upon it and said, "this is neither good or bad, it's just chemicals, and I shall form these chemicals in no specific image and without intelligence". Then plants, insects, fish, and man evolved from this puke without intelligence, each according to its inane kind.