Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ALS
So you're saying that the background of who said what discards what they say, irregardless of the facts?

First off, "irregardless" is not a word. Secondly, if you are going to argue from authority (which is, in itself, a fallacy) be sure you have an authority with some knowledge of the subject of which he addresses.

551 posted on 05/15/2003 3:18:33 PM PDT by Junior (Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
Main Entry: ir·re·gard·less
Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
Function: adverb
Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless
Date: circa 1912
nonstandard : REGARDLESS
usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.

http://m-w.com

563 posted on 05/15/2003 3:55:32 PM PDT by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson