Science is nothing else except questions. It is not and never has been an organized dogma. What is your unbiased authoritative source for that remark?
From the article:
Dini claimed that "one can validly refer to the ‘fact’ of human evolution, even if all of the details are not yet known."
A little dogmatic, isn't it?
I don't speak for Dini and for all I know, his words may have been taken out of context.
I'm just relating to my own experiences in the classroom and in the field.