To: gore3000
"Of course not, because no theory in science can be proven."
But wait, you evolutionists have been calling everyone who disagrees with the theory idiots, uneducated, dolts, unscientific, and many other foul names for disagreeing and now you tell me that you have been making these statements and there is no proof for the theory????????????????
I call someone an idiot when they refuse to address and in fact ignore facts, disregard evidence against their claims without explanation and make up the position of their opponents, such as claiming that their opponents' true agenda is the destruction of Christianity. I call creationism unscientific because it is unscientific. It fails the tests of the scientific method.
Seems to me that if a theory is unproven it is not stupid to disagree with it, don't ya think?
It is your strawman that we call people stupid just for 'disagreeing' with evolution.
ere we have people who claim that science is the be all and end all of knowledge and when asked for proof of their theory they all of a sudden say that science cannot give proof of anything!
Did anyone actually say that science is the end all and be all of all knowledge or are you just lying again?
371 posted on
05/02/2003 12:51:19 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
To: Dimensio
I call someone an idiot when they refuse to address and in fact ignore facts, disregard evidence against their claims without explanation and make up the position of their opponentsAnd where have the evolutuionists on this thread given evidence to support their position?????
Where have they refuted WITH FACTS the evidence provided by their opponents?
All that the evolutionists have done is attack Christianity, demonize their self-made strawman 'creationism' and call opponents fools and ignorant. However, no evidence in support of evolution has been given.
In addition, even though this thread is about Dini's discrimination against Christians no evidence has been given by him, or by evolutionists here to show that a Christian cannot be a scientist. In Post# 358 I give evidence that Christian can indeed be good scientists. I also made a challenge to evolutionists (and that means you) to show how evolution has benefitted humanity as much as the work of a single Christian - Pasteur. I do not see any attempt to refute my statement with facts. In fact, as I am typing this when I press the replies button it says 'no replies'. So who is it that is disregarding evidence and insulting people and not providing facts to support their position?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson