Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clear Channeling [Another loser scribbling for Rockwell]
lewrockwell.com ^ | 4/29/03 | Karen Kwiatkowski

Posted on 04/29/2003 9:34:38 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine

I listen to Sean Hannity sometimes, and recently I heard him speak in a mysterious code. I’ll bet you have too, but here goes.

He asked a caller where they listened to his radio show. Then he said what sounded to me like, "Are you clear channel?"

Later, I heard the words "clear channel" mentioned by other neo-con mouthpieces on the radio. But I didn’t know what it was.

Then came the Dixie Chicks controversy. Word was if you are a good American, love your country, and by extension, support Bush policy, you would no longer listen to Chick songs or buy Chick CDs. I incorrectly thought this was a natural backlash on the part of country music fans, and I expected the impact to be minimal and isolated, probably localized. But the national impact on airplay and CD sales was, in fact, huge. It didn’t seem like me and my cousins could have made that much difference just by calling our local country radio stations.

Especially since most of the local stations don’t take requests anymore.

Turns out, it may not have been my cousins who called the stations. And it turns out the stations are a station.

It’s Clear Channel!

Clear Channel is the largest radio operator in the United States, with around 1200 radio and over 35 TV stations reaching some 115 million Americans. I only know this because recently saw where the British Broadcasting Channel is worried about being added to the list. But I should have known sooner, because there are no secrets with Clear Channel.

For example, Clear Channel is big, and has been accused of having "a corporate culture in which dirty tricks are a way of life." Enron-like, some say.

After Sept. 11, 2001, Clear Channel stations refrained from playing a list of potentially offensive songs, including John Lennon's "Imagine" and the entire catalogue of Rage Against the Machine. They are capable of corporate discipline, it seems.

In the days leading up to the invasion of Iraq, Clear Channel talk radio provided 100% of what you want to hear if you speak neo-conservative, and the Clear Channel corporation sponsored a number of well publicized pro-war or anti-antiwar rallies.

Clear Channel is home-based in Texas, and it is no secret that Clear Channel Worldwide vice chairman Tom Hicks bought the Texas Rangers in 1999 from a little known Texas governor named George W. Bush for $250 million.

It is also no secret that the same Tom Hicks, as Chairman of the University of Texas Investment Management Corporation (UTIMCO) lobbied the same governor (Dubya) for some rules changes, then got in a little trouble for sending privatization contracts to Bush cronies. Sounds like déjà vu all over again, except we weren’t talking about rebuilding Iraq. Now that’s different!

And it is no secret that current Chairman and CEO of Clear Channel, L. Lowry Mays, is still on the UTIMCO Compensation Committee, and is a major Bush contributor.

Clear Channel also promotes concerts, including 26 recent and upcoming Dixie Chick concerts – normally very lucrative when you also own a radio business.

Which brings us back to the recent Chick apologies for Natalie Maines’ comment about being ashamed that George W. Bush was from Texas. Why did she apologize on Primetime Thursday? Because Clear Channel needs folks to get over this and come back to Dixie Chick concerts.

Maines did apologize for making a disrespectful remark, and she kind of apologized for "feeling that she had a lot of questions about the war that went unanswered."

Ironically, Clear Channel is now trying to recover from what their own radio network did to their concert business. It is too bad Diane Sawyer couldn’t ask what Maines’ "public apology" had to say about speech in America, or draw a comparison to the Baseball Hall of Fame’s cancellation of a Bull Durham anniversary event, because Tim Robbins’ opinions could have "placed troops [in Iraq] in danger." Yes, really!

In an age of a thousand TV and radio shows that celebrate human vice and go giddy over the humiliation and stupidity of "other" people, one does wonder why Natalie, by herself, must actually say she’s sorry on TV. Perhaps the neo-cons are more sensitive and tender-hearted than we thought.

Sawyer might also have wondered who decides what is "disrespectful" to a sitting President (or his cabinet members). Was neo-con party boy Newt’s recent public attack on Secretary of State Colin Powell at the American Enterprise Institute, engineered by the Defense Policy Group, disrespectful, or was Newt just stating his opinion because he has a lot of questions about the State Department that have gone unanswered?

If Maines had said "I’d proud Dubya is from Texas!" we might have seen a different story from Clear Channel propaganda masters. Courageous, they’d say! Patriotic and all American! Natalie is a model citizen, and looking really svelte, too! Buy concert tickets!

This would be a lot more fun if it was a neo-con conspiracy. But it isn’t. Clear Channel simply wants some FCC rules updated to allow them to expand their radio and TV businesses. To get that, they need to behave in a supportive manner under the current Bush administration. It’s just good business, like buying Bush’s baseball team and redirecting public moneys to friends of the family.

It may not be transparent, or even easy to identify, but it is definitely clear!

April 29, 2003

Karen Kwiatkowski [send her mail] is a recently retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: answer; blixiechicks; clearchannel; paleoconlibs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
This one was even more wretched.
1 posted on 04/29/2003 9:34:38 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; dighton; general_re; wimpycat; Howlin; Catspaw; hchutch
.
2 posted on 04/29/2003 9:35:20 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (unlike a paleocon, a tick doesn't pretend it is doing anything for its host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
So a supposed libertarian site like Lew Rockwell wants government regulation to be used to slow down the expansion of Clear Channel.

Maybe they need to look up "libertarian" in the dictionary
3 posted on 04/29/2003 9:36:10 AM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; dirtboy
Here is another winner.
4 posted on 04/29/2003 9:36:32 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (unlike a paleocon, a tick doesn't pretend it is doing anything for its host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
If stupidity were physically painful, Lew Rockwell would be begging for euthanasia...
5 posted on 04/29/2003 9:38:25 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Interesting. Thanks for post. Don't know Rockwell--is he a paleo, or something?
6 posted on 04/29/2003 9:39:05 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Wow, a Clear Channel-Bush conspiracy. She even managed to toss Enron's name into this disjointed diatribe.
7 posted on 04/29/2003 9:39:38 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
He asked a caller where they listened to his radio show. Then he said what sounded to me like, "Are you clear channel?"

Is that anything like "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"

Every day, Lew's site gets a bit more flaky. Can UFOs be far behind?

8 posted on 04/29/2003 9:40:03 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
I'll be damned - there IS a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy...I hope it is an effective one ;-)
9 posted on 04/29/2003 9:40:44 AM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Rockwell claims to be a libertarian of some stripe, but it is really hard to put a finger on what he really is - paleocon/lib, Buchananite, you name the fringe, he falls within it.
10 posted on 04/29/2003 9:41:33 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (unlike a paleocon, a tick doesn't pretend it is doing anything for its host)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
A "clear" channel is 50 KW AM station that broadcasts after sunset on frequency that it doesn't share with any other station... Based on the nature of AM radio waves, a "clear" channel can be heard all over the US in the evenings... "Clear Channel" is a play on words for this type of station's broadcast ability...
11 posted on 04/29/2003 9:41:52 AM PDT by vrwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy
So a supposed libertarian site like Lew Rockwell wants government regulation to be used to slow down the expansion of Clear Channel.

No kidding. This author inadvertantly uses Clear Channel as an example of the potential dangers of taking libertarian ideals too far.
12 posted on 04/29/2003 9:42:36 AM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I know that Dan Rather said the whole "frequency" thing, and that he was absurdly agitated when he said it, but I've never understood the whole meaning of the incident. Could someone explain it to me?
13 posted on 04/29/2003 9:44:02 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (It's not nice to fool Mr. Rumsfeld!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Here's betting he can't sell something to Clear Channel.
14 posted on 04/29/2003 9:44:19 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Numbers Guy
Maybe they need to look up "libertarian" in the dictionary

It appears right after "liberal," their ideological soulmates.

15 posted on 04/29/2003 9:44:31 AM PDT by A2J (Daschle is a poo-poo head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Baloney.

The Dixie Chicks tickets were presold BEFORE she made her remarks.

They were nonrefundable.
16 posted on 04/29/2003 9:44:38 AM PDT by Howlin (The most hated lair on FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Someone just walked up to Dan Blather one day in New Yawk and started beating the crap out of him. The assailant was shouting "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"
17 posted on 04/29/2003 9:45:19 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Southern, christian libertarian :)
18 posted on 04/29/2003 9:45:31 AM PDT by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
He is a self-titled paleolibertarian.
19 posted on 04/29/2003 9:46:22 AM PDT by wideawake (Support our troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Rockwell claims to be a libertarian of some stripe, but it is really hard to put a finger on what he really is - paleocon/lib, Buchananite, you name the fringe, he falls within it.

The medical term is "bellyacher."

20 posted on 04/29/2003 9:46:48 AM PDT by dighton (Amen-Corner Hatchet Team, Nasty Little Clique, Vulgar Horde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson