To: hmmmmm
>>How so, the Missouri too?
It's what they said on the tv - the really big one on the New Madrid fault had both rivers running backwards...
109 posted on
04/29/2003 2:59:05 AM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(404 tagline not found)
To: Keith in Iowa
No... They're wrong.
Just the Mississippi flowed north, and only for a short while to fill the new lakes, and just in that region.
Missouri connection is further north, up past St Louis a few miles.
114 posted on
04/29/2003 3:01:12 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
To: Keith in Iowa
I too heard the largest earthquake in American was along the Madrid fault. Rivers ran backwards for two days.
116 posted on
04/29/2003 3:02:39 AM PDT by
LowOiL
("I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me" -Gen. Patton)
To: Keith in Iowa
I found that odd because the MO runs back on itself at St. Charles at all times, the New Madrid Fault isn't a factor.
118 posted on
04/29/2003 3:03:38 AM PDT by
hmmmmm
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson