Posted on 04/28/2003 2:25:50 PM PDT by Remedy
The Rick Santorum controversy has illuminated a serious problem in the Republican Party: its leaders seem woefully ill-prepared to defend the pro-family position on homosexuality. As an attorney who trains pro-family activists how to debate this issue, I would like to offer my fellow Republicans the following advice.
First, don't dodge the issue in fear of political correctness or pro-"gay" media bias. Stand confidently upon the essential pro-family presuppositions that resonate with people of common sense: 1) normality is that which functions according to its design, 2) the heterosexual design of the human body and the natural family is self-evident, 3) respecting the design of life produces good results (conversely, rejecting that design produces bad results) and 4) simple observation validates these assumptions. No special education or "scientific" study is required.
Failure to articulate the logic of our position cedes the moral and intellectual battleground to the militant "gays," and leaves the impression (even among our own supporters) that we have no reasonable response, other than religious belief, to their attack on family values.
Second, contest the hidden false assumption underlying most pro-"gay" arguments that homosexuality is immutable. We have a strong case on this point since 1) proponents of the "gays are born that way" justification for normalizing homosexuality bear the burden of proof, 2) proof is absolutely necessary due to the severity of social change which is contemplated by their demands, 3) proponents cannot prove that homosexuality is immutable (Indeed, ex-homosexuals can prove that it is not.), 3) if homosexuality is not immutable, then logically it must be acquired (children being the most likely to acquire the condition because of their vulnerability to social conditioning), and 4) society must err on the side of caution, actively discouraging the normalization of homosexuality in order to protect children and others from the possibility of acquiring a homosexual condition with its attendant health risks.
Third, expose the deceptive terms, such as sexual orientation, diversity and homophobia, which are used by pro-"gay" proponents to confuse the issue and control the debate. This requires nothing but making them define their terms at the start of argument, then focusing the debate on clarifying the definitions and exposing their illogic and hypocrisy.
Consider sexual orientation, for example. Does orientation mean "state of mind" or conduct? If it includes conduct, which conduct? Does it include sodomy? Fisting? Rimming? Sadism? If not, why not? Regarding diversity, what is the standard used to decide who gets to be in the circle of inclusion? They don't have one, but you'll have fun with this -- especially if they attempt to draw the line at "hate" groups. What is their definition of hate? (and by that definition, do they "hate" us and thereby invalidate their own membership in the community of diversity?) Speaking of hate, remember that they have defined homophobia as "hate and fear of homosexuals." Ask them to identify some examples of non-homophobic opposition to homosexuality. They can't do it because they define all opposition as "homophobic." Do they really believe that disapproval of sodomy/rimming/fisting/sadism is irrational bigotry? You get the idea. You'll find that this technique derails virtually every pro-"gay" argument because each one relies on deceptive rhetoric.
Fourth and finally, get off the defensive and take the offensive on the homosexual issue by purging "gay" activism from the Republican Party. The implicit goal of the "gay" movement is the normalization of an anything-goes sexual morality -- the antithesis of the family values so dear to our Republican base. Instead of inviting into our tent the very constituency that many Republicans have spent years and fortunes opposing, why not conduct a meaningful family-values outreach to ethnic minorities? Let the Democrats continue to be the party of sexual deviance and let us exploit that identification to woo away their healthy families to the higher Republican standard.
What is needed from Republican leaders is articulate, confident and continual advocacy of the pro-family world view. Without it, we might as well say farewell to Rick Santorum and other defenders of family values, because if things continue as they are, these courageous people will have no place in the future GOP, the Gays' Other Party.
Never said any such thing. I like exactly what America has been for its entire history. A free republic based on the rule of law and run by Christians who understand what those things mean.
whom is it decided by?
You're doing a pretty good imitation of an advocate for the homosexual agenda, then. Might be worthy of an Academy Award.
I don't care to change it.
Then what are you doing here arguing about it?
But it seems to me that it is changing, otherwise you wouldn't see the need to be on here morally crusading.
That's exactly what I have said. If those who practice this stuff weren't in the political arena demanding that I accept their practices--if they weren't in the schools I pay for evangelizing for sodomy--I wouldn't be involved in political efforts to stop them. They could all go off in their corner and die of AIDs, and that would be that.
You believe America is a theocracy? It's not. You don't believe America is a theocracy? That's what I said. Who's the confused one?
Sovereign citizens of the United States, actuated by their conscience, their understanding of the demands made on them by their Creator, and their knowledge of how the world has worked throughout history.
Why? Who do you think should decide?
and a lot that didn't - whoops.
you mean by popular vote?
how is that different from a poll, which you previously said cannot decide right or wrong?
Yeah? Name me one that was destroyed that hadn't fallen into some kind of gross sin...idolatry, homosexuality, bestiality, total disregard for human life....
God is merciful and very slow to anger, but there is an outer limit on His patience.
Fortunately for us, throughout our history, the vast majority of the sovereign citizens of the US knew the difference between right and wrong, unlike the couple dozen here on FR who don't, seemingly.
i will leave aside "gross sin", "bestiality", and "total disregard for human life" since they were not a part of your original claim, to which i was responding.
to cite only the most obvious and recent example: the nazi regime in germany, which was destroyed, not only failed to accept homosexuals, but actively and vehemently persecuted them.
perhaps you will claim it was not God who destroyed the nazi's but the devil, to punish them for failing to support his evil gay agenda.
so, as you say, right and wrong is decided by the majority.
Nope, just a healthy disgust for homosexual behavior and the agressive homosexual agenda.
You folks should have left well enough alone.
is sodomy "right" in illinois, but "wrong" is texas?
that is what your "majority makes right" stance implies, which is why i wonder if that is really what you mean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.