To: Constitution Day
"the Princeton Review rated Duke as the most gay-unfriendly campus in the United States."
There's so much wrong this concept it's laughable. More unfriendly than say, Arkansas or Ol Miss? I find that hard to believe. And why would Dook stoodents give a rat's patutee what Princeton thinks? Oh, I forgot, that's close to where their parents live.
"I would expect such behavior from the boys in powder blue, but Duke? I am shocked. :)"
Ha, ha, CD, I think you're getting you're color code for sexuality mixed up. "Powder Blue" would denote being effeminate. Dook added black to their uniforms to denote their gay S&M leanings.
29 posted on
04/28/2003 12:26:33 PM PDT by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom!)
To: Lee'sGhost
And why would Dook stoodents give a rat's patutee what Princeton thinks?
I may be wrong but I don't think that the Princeton Review (a private co. like Kaplan) has any real affiliation to Princeton University, other than the fact that it may have been started by some alums.
40 posted on
04/28/2003 12:33:28 PM PDT by
bourbon
To: Lee'sGhost
Actually Ole Miss has had a gay students alliance/association since I was there in the late 70s.
I would think Wyoming might be more a choice for hostility to gays on campus.
It's a known fact that the faded gentility of the Old South always had a seamy gay side. I've witnessed it from scandal to scandal my whole life. Just peruse a list of native son writers and playwrights.
And the gay congressman from Missisippi in the early 80s busted with the page in the Capital bathroom...Hinson I think(?).
Nah...Queer Nation is alive and well in the cotton states...just a bit more discreet....like all Southerners.
47 posted on
04/28/2003 12:37:05 PM PDT by
wardaddy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson