The only difference I see is Ann Coulter and Michael Savage both expressing an opinion in a overtly colorful manner that some find facetious and some find violently hateful. There is zero difference between the two other than style of delivery. The message is the same.
Yes I will dog after BS I see BS and I WILL call ANYONE on it. And yes something stinks. If a FR poster chooses to come and post on a thread, depositing a huge smelly stinking steaming pile of manure, that poster should be prepared for the backlash.
Michael Moore lies and uses distortion of the truth to lend fecundity to his propaganda. Michael Savage and Ann Coulter use wit, style, and verbal gymnastics to express truth without distorting the facts. To say that Michael Savage is the Michael Moore of the right suggests ignorance and a lack of familiarity of Savage's show and beliefs.Those beliefs are shared by the majority here. What many question is Savage's style,that's all.
You still did not answer the question. What's your agenda against Savage? The GOP is a big tent party, and if we are to accept moderate RINOs we must accept hard core RW members like Savage(even though Savage is a libertarian IMO). Frankly, the most extreme ideologue out there who does damage to the right is not Michael Savage but Pat Buchanan.