Anti-Big Government.
Anti-crappy lawsuits.
Pro Free-market.
Anti-Taxes.
No welfare. No HillaryCare. No SS ponzi schemes. Voluntary contractual agreements where you don't have to hire people via qoutas. No free loaders. Pro-Self Defense. Pro-Property Rights.
But we're also against bedroom police and sending pot smokers to the state pen. This negates all of our other positions.
If you take the tack that our laws must remain neutral to something so basic to the very foundations of our civilization as the health and welfare of the human family, then the Constitution can likewise remain totally neutral to something such as capitalism. If the vast majority of people choose to take over the means of production, let the old money system rot in useless banks, and have love become the new medium of exchange, then that should be allowed to happen, too, one supposes. In a perfectly Constitutional and legal way, political power can become assumed at the point of production, rather than in Washington, or in any state capital, leaving the old system more of a curious anachronism and a quaint museum. If laws can remain neutral to societal health, then so can they be neutral to the accumulation or expropriation of economic wealth.