Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antaresequity
What a bunch of BS...A 'sonar' [which is basically a side scanning directable bottom pinger]...could no more tell a body from a log, a sturgeon...our a mound of mud.

I would think it depends upon the sonar. High-frequency equipment with image processing capapbility would probably be able to do it.

15 posted on 04/27/2003 3:04:34 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
Have you all seen those new sonar imagine that clearing shows the picture of your childs face in utero. STUNNING.
17 posted on 04/27/2003 3:14:59 PM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
Modesto Police Chief Roy Wasden confirmed investigators believe they found the body as early as mid-March, but could not retrieve it. "The waves came up and we couldn't go down. I can't tell you the frustration we felt," Wasden said.

If true, I can't believe the chief would admit this incompetance. The waves have not been "up" for the month between mid-March and when the bodies washed up.

21 posted on 04/27/2003 3:23:33 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
I would think it depends upon the sonar. High-frequency equipment with image processing capapbility would probably be able to do it.

Not if what they have is the same as the stuff they use to look for Nessy. They can't tell a sea monster from a school of fish.

49 posted on 04/28/2003 12:17:00 AM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson