Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
There is also such a thing as court-supervised visitation ---but from other cases I've seen, a restraining order means that there is no visitation until after custody and visitation are legally resolved. I'd wonder why she agreed to meet him ---or if was to give him just "one more chance". With the similar case that happened here ---the woman's family even said she always gave "one more chance" and they would try to convince her otherwise.
67 posted on 04/27/2003 2:40:04 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: FITZ
There is also such a thing as court-supervised visitation ---but from other cases I've seen, a restraining order means that there is no visitation until after custody and visitation are legally resolved.

There are different levels of restraining orders and obtaining one through the divorce process is usually weaker than obtaining one through just getting a restraining order. My ex's initial restraining order said he wasn't to disturb my peace or harass me. After he assaulted me in a parking lot (neutral location to swap the children mandated by the court), the prosecutor's office has bumped it up to a "no-hostile contact" order, which just means he's not allowed to assault me, again. Sarcastic LOL.

As far as the children, Washington state requires extensive documentation to keep one parent from the child, EVEN if the parent has a past history of violence towards the other parent. It would need to be proved that parent was a definite threat to the children, not just to the other parent.

176 posted on 04/27/2003 6:32:29 PM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson