Skip to comments.
UK Newspaper Says Documents Link Bin Laden to Iraq
Reuters ^
| April 26, 2003
Posted on 04/26/2003 4:27:31 PM PDT by sourcery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
04/26/2003 4:27:31 PM PDT
by
sourcery
To: sourcery
2
posted on
04/26/2003 4:34:08 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com ..)
To: sourcery
Whatever the differences between Saddam and Bin Laden were, they had a shared goal -- death to America.
To: sourcery
4
posted on
04/26/2003 4:43:02 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(The Oracle on Mount Doom)
To: Angelus Errare
Ping Trois.
5
posted on
04/26/2003 4:50:51 PM PDT
by
Green Knight
(Looking forward to seeing Jeb stepping over Hillary's rotting political corpse in '08.)
To: sourcery
This can't be true. The Left said that Saddam and Al-Qaeda were not connected. They said that. They did.
To: sourcery
I'm suspicious of "documents" and stories coming out of Iraq at this time. There is a lot of motive to cause horror and dismay. It has happened before i.e. WWI etc.
7
posted on
04/26/2003 5:01:09 PM PDT
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: The Great Satan
fyi.
To: sourcery
SHAZAM!
Al Qaeda connections in Iraq?
Gollollieeee
Suprize, Surprize, Surprize...NOT
To: sourcery
Now I just don't know what to believe...
I have to go consult the Dixie Twits about this. I mean if you can't believe a washed-up naked country singer who can you believe.
Career advice to the three bimbos--learn how to say "Hi Sailor" or "Would you like fries with that?"
10
posted on
04/26/2003 5:43:39 PM PDT
by
Artem55
To: sourcery
If it turns out there
is a connection, who will be brave enough to tell Barbra Streisand the truth?
Barbra's Thoughts, Posted on March 26, 2003
"The first casualty when war comes, is truth." Senator Hiram Johnson 1917 Bush and his Administration appear to operate under two related principles: (1) regardless of fact, if we say it enough times, the American people will believe us and (2) if we say something, you just have to trust us that its true, forget proof and logic.
Unfortunately, with regard to the first principle he is right. He found this to be the case with his domestic policy and it seems to be true in foreign affairs as well.
Take his repeated assertion of a connection between Saddam Hussein and September 11. Despite the fact that he and others have yet to offer any proof, a recent poll of Americans, shows that about half believe there is a connection between Saddam and 9-11. Why wait for an accurate intelligence report?
All Bush had to do was repeat Saddam Hussein and 9-11 in the same sentence over and over again and then wait while the media reported his statements without analysis, and millions of Americans accepted it without question.
Who cares about the facts and truth?
We should.
11
posted on
04/26/2003 6:26:59 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Schumer is a Smellfungus. Schumer is a Shmellfungus. Schumer is a Schmellfungus.)
To: syriacus
I think there is a link between Al Qaeda and Saddam through their hatred of America. This extends to all terrorists opposed to the United States. Sharing a common goal, it would be unusual if they didn't support each other. The linkage between Saudi Arabia and 9/11 is obvious in that fifteen Saudis were involved.
Yet we keep kissing the Saudi feet even though it was found that Prine Bandar's wife was a clandestine supporter of Al Qaeda. There are some strange friends involved in terrorism and the response to them, by people who should know better. Our intelligence is out to lunch or being ignored.
12
posted on
04/26/2003 7:11:49 PM PDT
by
meenie
To: meenie
There are some strange friends involved in terrorism and the response to them, by people who should know better. Our intelligence is out to lunch or being ignored.Maybe our intelligence knows something, that we don't know, about our relationship with Saudi Arabia.
13
posted on
04/27/2003 5:09:01 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Schumer is a Smellfungus. Schumer is a Shmellfungus. Schumer is a Schmellfungus.)
To: syriacus
If it turns out there is a connection, who will be brave enough to tell Barbra Streisand the truth?
This chubby crooner with a nose like a parrot should be subjected to a public caning in Times Square. Talk about high ratings TV. I would pay to see that.
14
posted on
04/27/2003 5:18:23 AM PDT
by
doosee
To: sourcery
According to the Telegraph, bin Laden's name had been concealed in several places on the Iraqi documents with white correction fluid. Its correspondent scraped the fluid off with a razor to uncover the name.Regular rocket scientists, these guys.
15
posted on
04/27/2003 5:26:07 AM PDT
by
brewcrew
(It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into. - Jonathan Swift)
To: syriacus
Who will be brave enough to tell Susan Sarandon that there is a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq?
Sarandon plans to act up before State of the Union
WASHINGTON - Just before President Bush delivers his State of the Union address tonight, activist actress Susan Sarandon plans to upstage him. "Before our kids start coming home from Iraq in body bags and women and children start dying in Baghdad, I need to know, 'What did Iraq do to us?'" the 56-year-old New Yorker asks in a 30-second television spot that will air just before the 9 p.m. speech.
Edward Peck, a former ambassador to Iraq, tells her in the bit: "The answer is nothing. Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, nothing to do with Al Qaeda. ... Invading Iraq will increase terrorism, not reduce it."
The White House has signaled it may soon lay out evidence proving him wrong.
The spot is being paid for by an anti-war group called True Majority, run by Ben Cohen of Ben & Jerry's ice cream fame. It urges Bush to seek a peaceful resolution and to allow the inspections to continue.
16
posted on
04/27/2003 2:31:44 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Sarandon and Streisand promoted the idea that there was no connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq.)
To: syriacus
BUMP
To: sourcery
bump
18
posted on
11/15/2003 9:14:17 AM PST
by
Republican Wildcat
(November 4, 2003. The day the 32-year Democrat lock on Kentucky came to an end.)
To: sourcery
I wonder if the nitwit, drunken, lightweight, no gravitas frat boy president waited to release this until he knew Dean was going to be the nominee. Naw. He is just too stupid to do that. Isn't he?
19
posted on
11/15/2003 9:16:42 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Why aren't the Clintons living out their remaining years on Alcatraz?)
To: doug from upland
You left out cocaine snorting....;)
20
posted on
11/15/2003 10:19:54 AM PST
by
MEG33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson