To: weegee
We are not talking about Nevada here. If you want to discuss what other States do in relation to this issue, then we will discuss the States that have already found these sorts of laws to be unconstitutional.
The State of Texas mucked up the waters and opened the doors to challenges by their wording of this law.
578 posted on
04/28/2003 2:18:23 PM PDT by
Luis Gonzalez
(When the elephants are stampeding, don't worry about the pissants.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Nevada law (or New Hampshire law) "discriminates" on the same basis (heterosexual vs. homosexual) if the Supreme Court rules in your favor.
The Supreme Court doesn't determine what goes against Texas' state constitution, it determines on the national level. Please try to keep up.
584 posted on
04/28/2003 2:23:41 PM PDT by
weegee
(NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
To: Luis Gonzalez
READ CLOSELY. Your mind may be closed on this matter but I was referring to other states where sodomy was already legal (like Nevada and New Hampshire).
571 -weegee-
We are not talking about Nevada here. If you want to discuss what other States do in relation to this issue, then we will discuss the States that have already found these sorts of laws to be unconstitutional.
578 -luis-
Weird. -- Weegee agrees that states can make sodomy 'legal'. [by declaring such laws unconstitutional]
And Luis admits that states can delare sodomy laws unconstitutional. [making sodomy legal]
The mind spins.
598 posted on
04/28/2003 2:41:12 PM PDT by
tpaine
(Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weak.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson