Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee; tpaine; Luis Gonzalez; sinkspur
Round and round and round and round. It's the same tired voices making the same tired arguments.

Yeah, and it's always the same people making absolute concrete sound sense and giving rational debate a good name. (You know who are, bravo.)

516 posted on 04/27/2003 11:17:36 PM PDT by lurky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies ]


To: lurky
Reading over your posts you still don't get it that men and women may both engage in acts of sodomy. There is no "unequal protection". Mem and women are prohibited from committing acts of sodomy with members of the same sex. And this applies equally to men and women.

If you wanted to challenge it under "freedom of association" you might stand more of a chance, but not over "equal protection". And as it is discussed on this and other threads, some states which permit homosexual sodomy still make a distinction over the the age of consent for adults and minors to have sex.

Some states permit heterosexuals to engage in intercourse, sodomy, what have you at say age 16 (and that includes a partner of age 18+) while holding homosexuals in violation of statutory rape laws for engaging in homosexual sodomy below the age of 18. A "back door" way to throw out the disparity in the age of consent laws, eh?

518 posted on 04/27/2003 11:43:10 PM PDT by weegee (NO BLOOD FOR RATINGS: CNN let human beings be tortured and killed to keep their Baghdad bureau open)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson