Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
I'm not sure I understood your post (the 14th ammendment ref)...... but I too am looking forward to seeing how this unfolds.

What IS your position? That privacy trumps any activity in the privacy of your own home? Hmmmm...... not sure ALL activity should be legal. Or is this just a ruling on sexual activity in the privacy of your own home? Hmmmm..... not sure all of that would be legal either.

This'll be interesting.
10 posted on 04/26/2003 12:49:02 PM PDT by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: bart99
I support the constitutional forms as they stand now in this regards. Frankly, while the liberals are crowing that the court took this intending to strike down the law, I see the potential for a reverse strike against Roe -v- Wade and Doe -v- Bolton. Their is NO intrinsic "right to privacy" in the original BOR, the 14th Amendment folks keep arguing that it redefined the BOR, perhaps the SCOTUS will now correct that misunderstanding.
16 posted on 04/26/2003 12:54:44 PM PDT by narses (Christe Eleison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson